boston.com News your connection to The Boston Globe
GLOBE EDITORIAL

Profiles in prejudice

By Globe Staff, 5/5/2004

    On city boulevards and rural lanes, whites and women are far more likely to receive written warnings instead of tickets when stopped for identical traffic offenses, according to a Boston Globe study of newly released state records.

 FOLLOW-UPS

8/8/2004
Police plan public meeting

5/9/2004
Chiefs deny racial profiling

5/6/2004
Civil rights advocates laud plan

5/5/2004
Police chiefs decry study

5/4/2004
Racial profiling is confirmed
Northeastern study [PDF]
Report summary
Who got a passing grade?
Police response [MS Word]

2/16/2004
Police flouting 'no fix' law on tickets

1/21/2004
Profiling study cites dozens of locales Charts
Northeastern study [PDF]

1/20/2004
Reilly starts push to end profiling in police stops

1/17/2004
Boston police to get tough on tickets

9/19/2003
Judge: Suspect must stay in jail

9/18/2003
Seeing bias, evidence tossed

8/5/2003
Deeper look at profiling

7/24/2003
Funding urged for study

5/24/2003
Ticketing cited despite curbs

3/5/2003
Romney backs profile tracking
People asked to join task force

1/25/2003
Chief: Glitch caused error

1/8/2003
Task force to review data


 THE SERIES

Day 1:
Race, sex, and age drive ticketing
Minority officers are stricter on minorities
Boston to track all stops by police

Graphics:
Who gets fined for speeding
Minority officers
Most-favored status
One officer's week

Town-by-town:
Ticketing whites vs. minorities
Large departments | All

Ticketing women vs. men
Large departments | All


Day 2:
Punishment varies by town and officer

Graphics:
How tickets raise insurance
Ranking the departments
Littering is worse?

Town-by-town:
Toughest on speeders
Large departments | All
Locals vs. out-of-towners
Large departments | All


Day 3:
Troopers fair, tough in traffic encounters

Graphics:
Frequent ticketers
How fast can you go?


Editorial: Tickets to fix
Op-Ed: Looking deeper
Op-Ed: Study proves nothing
Profiles in prejudice

 ONLINE EXTRAS

Q & A
Secretary of Public Safety Edward A. Flynn, the senior law enforcement official in Massachusetts, spoke with the Globe about this series. Q & A

Detailed report
A closer look at how the Globe analyzed hundreds of thousands of traffic tickets.
Download study
This .PDF document requires Adobe Acrobat

Online chat
Globe reporter Bill Dedman chatted with Boston.com readers about this series.
Read full transcript

 EARLIER REPORTS

In January, the Globe published the first results of its analysis.

Part 1:
Citations reveal disparity
Totals key to computations

Graphics:
Tracking tickets
Searches by race and age

Charts:
Searching minorities more often
Ticketing their own


Part 2:
Police not pressed on race
Tewksbury cop is tops
Fridays worst for tickets
Scope of monitoring reduced

Graphics:
Where race was not recorded

Charts:
Failing to record the race
Searching more cars

THE 249 police departments in Massachusetts cited for apparent racial profiling in a major study released yesterday should resist defensiveness and accept the value of a data-driven approach to overcoming this significant impediment to a just society. In the study, Northeastern University's Institute on Race and Justice analyzed of 1.6 million citations between April 2001 and June 30, 2003 and found a pattern of disparities in traffic citations. This requires both reflection by individual departments and explanations to minority motorists who live in or commute through the communities where there are indications of profiling. Edward Flynn, the state's secretary of public safety, rightly argues that there is nothing more important to effective policing than the "trust and confidence" of the public. Flynn, who is required to identify departments that appear to engage in racial or gender profiling, is not offering any police discounts. He could have determined that only departments cited for disparities in several categories of the study -- Boston, Brookline, and Brockton among them -- be required to collect a full year of detailed data on all traffic stops. Instead, he wisely ordered that even one category triggers the in-depth collection requirement. Some police departments may feel stigmatized. But any department where officers are significantly more likely to search minority drivers or give warnings rather than tickets to white drivers -- such as Bedford and Newburyport, respectively -- needs to undergo careful self-examination even if there is no overall disparity in ticketing between whites and minorities. Flynn says it will take about six months to design the forms and procedures needed to implement the next stage of analysis. Though officers will be required to do more paperwork, the results could be illuminating, and not just in the area of biased decision making. With the addition of information such as precise locations and time of day, Flynn says, police departments should come to understand not only what is going on but why. Good data collection may vindicate some departments. If, for example, traffic enforcement efforts are shown to focus on areas with both a high number of accidents and a large percentage of minority residents or motorists, then some discrepancies would be understandable. If not, then police departments may be simultaneously engaging in racial profiling and ignoring dangerous traffic hot spots. Both Flynn and criminologist JacK McDevitt, a principal author of the study, urge police departments to explain the findings through a series of regional meetings that would maximize the possibility of reaching minority motorists. The public needs to hear an acknowledgment that with the power to stop cars comes the responsibility to be fair.

SEARCH GLOBE ARCHIVES
 
Globe Archives Today (free)
Yesterday (free)
Past 30 days
Last 12 months
 Advanced search