|
![]() ![]()
|
NOBEL FOR MIT ECONOMIST
Date: Wednesday, October 16, 1985 After receiving news of the award, he immediately rebuked President Reagan for coining political positions that contradicted virtually all the findings of Modigliani's 40 years of investigations. "I think one of the big surprises of our life . . . is how a man like the president could have started out, could have gotten elected on the grounds that the deficit was the greatest curse that ever occurred and caused all kinds of harm . . .. Then this man has suddenly turned around and . . . somehow his administration explains that the deficit does not reduce savings," Modigliani said. "We are ruining (the future of our) youth, we are ruining the rest of the world, and all of that because the president says that the last thing we're going to do is raise taxes. Well, hell!" he snorted. Modigliani spoke at a festive press conference in Cambridge, hastily called after he became the 13th American among 21 economists to win the economics prize since it was established in 1969. The 7 a.m. phone call from Stockholm was "the best alarm clock I've had in a long time," he said. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences cited Modigliani's "life-cycle" hypothesis, first advanced more than 30 years ago, as the chief reason for the award. Modigliani said yesterday, "I sometimes think that my work on this subject was colored by the savings bank where I was banking at the time when I was working on this. Their motto was, 'Save it when you need it least, have it when you need it most.' " The view that people routinely vary their savings across the trajectory of their lifetime - building up funds when they are young, drawing down when they are old - sounds common-sensical today, Modigliani said, but before he wrote, the conventional view among technical economists was that savings activity was confined mainly to the rich. His achievement was to introduce the life-cycle behavior into the austere mathematical models with which economists work. He paid tribute to his collaborator on the early life-cycle work, Richard Brumberg, a graduate student and close friend who died of a brain tumor at the age of 25, just as the method was being introduced. The life-cycle approach has since proved to be a tool adopted by economists of every persuasion to study everything from retirement schemes to taxes, with a single fundamental amendment. Modigliani said that the main important addition was made by Harvard University's Martin Feldstein and Alicia Munnell of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, who had shown that Social Security could affect the timing of retirement, and therefore that it might have unanticipated effects on the savings rate. The Nobel Prize citation also mentioned Modigliani's work on corporate finance, a secondary theme throughout his career. With Merton Miller of the University of Chicago, he wrote in 1961 the paper that first advanced what has become known since as the "efficient markets" hypothesis, arguing that information about the future quickly becomes incorporated in the market price of securities. And he has been a continuous contributor to the exploding literature of corporate finance ever since. He is the only man ever to be elected president of both the American Economic Association and the American Finance Association. A university professor, he holds a dual appointment at MIT, as a member of both the economics department and the Sloan School of Management. At the press conference yesterday, Modigliani traded champagne toasts with his colleague Paul Samuelson, the first American Nobel laureate in economics, in 1970, and gibed President Reagan. The impact of the American budget deficit on the world economy was "a tragedy much greater than I expected," he said of a paper on the economic effects of government borrowing that Modigliani wrote 15 years ago. The award to Modigliani, an extemely well-liked man, was applauded yesterday across the spectrum of professional economics. Said Samuelson, ''With many people with respect to the Nobel Prize, it's a question of 'if;' with Franco, it was only a question of 'when.' " WARSH ;10/15,13:58 LDRISC;10/16,15:00 NOBEL16
|
|
|
![]() |
|