Home
Help

Click here to search the archives

Alphabetical listing of contents
Archives
Big Dig
Book Reviews
Boston Capital
Business
Calendar
Classifieds
Columns
Comics
Corrections
The Daily User
Death Notices
Editorials
Health | Science
Latest News
Letters to the Editor
Living | Arts
Lottery
Metro | Region
Movie Times
Movie Reviews
Music Online
Nation | World
Obituaries
Opinions
Page One
Pass It On
Plugged In
Special Reports
Sports
Sports Scoreboard
Starts & Stops
Sunday Magazine
TV Times
Weather
Week in Photos

Search the Globe:

Today
Yesterday

Fleet Bank
The Boston Globe OnlineBoston.com Boston Globe Online / Archives

A FITTING PRIZE FOR PEACE

Author: Date: Sunday, October 8, 1989
Page: A30
Section: EDITORIAL PAGE
The Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the Dalai Lama confers international recognition, not only on the spiritual and political leader of the Tibetan people, but also on the values and ideals that he represents.

As it did when selecting Andrei Sakharov, Lech Walesa and Bishop Desmond Tutu, the Nobel committee honored the Dalai Lama for his devotion to the principles and methods of nonviolence. "The Dalai Lama in his struggle for the liberation of Tibet consistently has opposed the use of violence," said the committee in its citation. "He has instead advocated peaceful solutions based upon tolerance and mutual respect in order to preserve the historical and cultural heritage of his people."

At the end of a century that has seen millions of innocent men, women and children murdered by zealots of one totalitarian credo or another, while duped or dishonest intellectuals approved the proposition that the ends justified the means, it is fitting that a prize for peace be given to those rare figures who refuse the corrupting influence of violent methods. Like Tutu, Sakharov and Walesa -- and Martin Luther King before them -- the Dalai Lama has sanctified his cause by accepting the discipline of peaceful means.

The Nobel Prize also recognizes that cause. The committee's allusion to ''the liberation of Tibet" represents a political judgment, an implicit, yet unmistakable, rebuke to the Chinese communist regime that has colonized and terrorized Tibet.

The testy response from officials of that regime, who denounce foreign interference in the internal affairs of China, has a familiar ring. The Nobel prizes accorded to Tutu, Walesa and Sakharov incited similar displays of displeasure from Pretoria, Warsaw and Moscow. In each case the prize afflicted powerful regimes, making it more difficult for them to violate the human rights of their subjects with impunity.

In its citation of the Dalai Lama, the Nobel committee evoked a principle that distinguishes the plight of Tibetans from that of black South Africans, supporters of Solidarity or Soviet citizens yearning for free speech and the rule of law. The Dalai Lama, as the committee noted, fights "to preserve the historical and cultural heritage of his people."

Like the Kurds in Iraq, Iran and Turkey, Tibetans are not only denied their human rights; they also are threatened with cultural extinction. The International Commission of Jurists found in 1960 that the Chinese committed acts of genocide "in an attempt to destroy the Tibetans as a religious group."

The toll of Tibetans who perished by executions, torture, starvation and the exactions of prison and forced labor camps has been estimated at more than a million. The agony of Tibet moved Alexander Solzhenitsyn to call Beijing's reign there "more brutal and inhumane than any other communist regime in the world." The Nobel committee has made it much harder for the regime in Beijing to conceal its brutality against Tibet.

BERGER;10/05 NKELLY;10/10,16:03 EDALAILA


Click here for advertiser information Fleet Bank

Table of Contents

© Copyright 1997 Globe Newspaper Company

Home