Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

October 25
Victims could now collect

October 2
Geoghan's sister hits guards

October 1
Geoghan's sister to speak

September 27
Conviction erasure protested
Druce is hospitalized again
Guard ad seeks understanding

September 24
Inquiry: Druce beaten as child

September 20
Druce pleads not guilty in slay
Geoghan claims guard assault

September 14
Report says Druce in a rage

September 13
Letter: Druce abused as a boy

September 12
Geoghan bore guards' abuse
Lawyer: Mail deluges accused

September 11
Expanded panel is sought

September 8
Druce is returned from hospital

September 5
Geoghan consultant ties eyed

September 4
Conflict raised on consultant

September 3
Bias concerns raised in probe

September 2
No new panel members seen

August 31
Geoghan panel to expand

Earlier stories

Search for:
Time period:

Spotlight Report

'Appropriate' steps promised

But Cardinal later sent priest to parish in Weston

By Sacha Pfeiffer, Globe Staff, 1/25/2002

 Transcript
Letters show Geoghan in denial
'Appropriate' steps promised
Police probed Geoghan in 1986
Five weeks after assuring a devout parishioner that "appropriate pastoral decisions will be made" about repeated complaints that John J. Geoghan had abused her seven nephews while he was assigned to a Dorchester parish, then-Archbishop Bernard F. Law transferred Geoghan to a new parish in Weston, where he allegedly continued to molest children.

Law made his assurance to Margaret Gallant in a Sept. 21, 1984, five-sentence letter that read, "The matter of your concern is being investigated and appropriate pastoral decisions will be made both for the priest and God's people . . . Please pray for me."

Within two weeks of receiving Gallant's Sept. 6, 1984 letter, in which she reported that Geoghan had again been seen "in the company of boys," the archbishop removed Geoghan from St. Brendan's parish in Dorchester and placed him "in between assignments."

But the following month, Law notified Geoghan that he was being assigned to St. Julia parish in Weston, effective Nov. 13, 1984. The transfer came after Dr. Robert W. Mullins reported to church officials that Geoghan "is now able to resume full pastoral activities without any need for specific restrictions," according to an Oct. 20 letter in which Mullins described Geoghan as a "long-time friend."

The Spotlight Team reported last week that Mullins is a general practitioner with no experience in psychiatry or psychology. Geog han's sister, Catherine Geoghan, has identified Mullins as the family's doctor for more than 40 years.

Gallant's letter to Law marked the second time she wrote to notify church officials of Geoghan's alleged misconduct. A 1982 letter to Cardinal Humberto Medeiros received this response: "To be sure, we cannot accept sin, but we know well that we must love the sinner and pray for him."

Gallant's 1984 letter to Law included this apparent reference to Medeiros's letter: "We do not accuse this priest of sin, since we are all sinners, but rather we speak here of crime."

This story ran on page A21 of the Boston Globe on 1/25/2002.
Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy