Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

March 11
Victims' lawyer to sue Dupre

March 6
Suit accuses insurer of fraud

March 5
Charges against bishop eyed

March 1
Activists seek sex abuse panel

February 26
Alleged victim to aid probe

February 13
Springfield probe is sought

January 7, 2004
Agents faced reluctant aides

December 3
Church settles with victim

November 15
Settlement fuels money advice

November 12
Claims set aside until 2004

October 30
Hard line set on abuse trials

October 21
Most plaintiffs accept deal

October 19
Therapy sought in abuse suit

October 17
Lawyer says settlement near

October 8
Victims agonize over deal

September 12
Victims seen taking settlement

September 11
Church deal a boon for lawyers

September 10
Church in $85 million accord
Archdiocese facing new strains
Most plaintiffs to accept deal
O'Malley makes an appeal

September 9
Negotiations resume in cases

Earlier stories

Search for:
Time period:

Spotlight Report

Archdiocese hands over files on abuse cases

By Kevin Cullen, Globe Staff, 3/20/2002

The Archdiocese of Boston yesterday gave state prosecutors four boxes of files containing information about the victims of about 90 priests accused of sexually abusing children over the last 50 years.

More than two weeks after agreeing to supply prosecutors with the information they need to decide whether to bring criminal charges, archdiocese officials brought the files to Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly's office yesterday afternoon.

''We're in the process of reviewing the information,'' Reilly said in an interview. ''We'll put it on a database. It'll take a few days to see what we've got.''

The database will allow prosecutors to see whether, as they believe, some priests abused children in different counties, helping to resolve jurisdictional questions.

Essex District Attorney Kevin M. Burke, president of the state's district attorneys association, said that while prosecutors assume most cases are so old they will fall outside the statute of limitations, he was irked that the archdiocese waited until the last minute to turn over the information.

In January and February, the archdiocese had given prosecutors in five counties the names of nearly 90 priests, but prosecutors said they could not determine whether any of the priests should be charged until they had victims' names and case files.

Under pressure from Reilly and five district attorneys, the archdiocese agreed March 1 to turn over information about victims and to waive confidentiality agreements the church had reached with victims. The archdiocese agreed to turn over the information in phases, but none was delivered until yesterday.

''It's one thing to say you'll be cooperative; it's another to play on the margins of cooperation,'' said Burke. ''I'm beginning to get annoyed. Everything's a couple days late. Time is of the essence here. Every day counts.''

Archdiocese officials have said poor record-keeping made it difficult to comply with prosecutors' requests more quickly.

This story ran on page A32 of the Boston Globe on 3/20/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy