Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

March 11
Victims' lawyer to sue Dupre

March 6
Suit accuses insurer of fraud

March 5
Charges against bishop eyed

March 1
Activists seek sex abuse panel

February 26
Alleged victim to aid probe

February 13
Springfield probe is sought

January 7, 2004
Agents faced reluctant aides

December 3
Church settles with victim

November 15
Settlement fuels money advice

November 12
Claims set aside until 2004

October 30
Hard line set on abuse trials

October 21
Most plaintiffs accept deal

October 19
Therapy sought in abuse suit

October 17
Lawyer says settlement near

October 8
Victims agonize over deal

September 12
Victims seen taking settlement

September 11
Church deal a boon for lawyers

September 10
Church in $85 million accord
Archdiocese facing new strains
Most plaintiffs to accept deal
O'Malley makes an appeal

September 9
Negotiations resume in cases

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

Norfolk DA: Most priests can't be tried

By Walter V. Robinson, Globe Staff, 4/10/2002

Norfolk District Attorney William R. Keating, in a sharp rebuke to the Archdiocese of Boston for its longtime practice of shielding priests who molested children, said yesterday that the passage of time will prevent prosecutions of most of the priests whose names were referred to his office.

Because of the church's secrecy, Keating said in an interview, ''the lives of many innocent victims were ruined, and people who are nothing more than common criminals cannot be brought to justice.''

The priests who abused children, he said, ''were involved in a sordid masquerade. Everyone thought of them as trusted saviors of souls, but they were instead diabolical destroyers of lives.''

Keating is the first of five Eastern Massachusetts DAs to complete his case file review of priests whose records the prosecutors insisted the archdiocese turn over for possible prosecution.

Of the 25 priests' names given to Norfolk County, Keating said that, by agreement with the Church, he will refer three to the New Hampshire attorney general because the alleged molestation occurred in New Hampshire.

The three were identified in a letter from Keating to, the archdiocese's lawyer as the Rev. Robert V. Gale, Robert Towner and Thomas D. Donnelly. Towner and Donnelly are no longer listed as priests in the church's annual directories. None of the three could be reached for comment.

Of the other 22 names, Keating said 12 of them could not be prosecuted because the statute of limitations had passed. Allegations against six others were for acts in other counties. He said one case remains under investigation. Another involved allegations that were not criminal. Another was about John J. Geoghan, who is in prison after one conviction and is awaiting trial on other charges in Suffolk County. The final case involves a priest Keating only recently sought records for.

Walter Robinson's can be reached at wrobinson@globe.com.

This story ran on page A20 of the Boston Globe on 4/10/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy