Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

April 7
Vt. church in record settlement

March 14
In Albany, bishop profile raised
Book Review: Guard of lies

February 28
Church hierarchy faulted
More than 80% of victims male

February 27
Diocese gives abuse data
Abuse peaked in '60s
2d man to aid Dupre case

February 26
Alleged victim to aid probe

February 24
Sniezyk clarifies his remarks

February 23
Prelate: Harm unrecognized

February 21
Springfield report questioned

February 20
Lawyer: Sermon riled accuser

February 17
4% of priests in US accused

February 12
Bishop resigns after claims

February 6
Arlington priest cited in suit

Earlier stories

Search for:
Time period:

Spotlight Report

NEGLIGENCE CLAIM

Judge defends staying on priest case

By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff, 5/4/2002

A Suffolk Superior Court judge presiding over a negligence lawsuit against the Boston Archdiocese and against the priest who supervised convicted pedophile Christopher Reardon has defended his decision to remain on the case, even though he attended seminary with the priest in the mid-1960s.

(none)

In a footnote to a ruling issued yesterday, Superior Court Judge Thomas E. Connolly wrote that he has repeatedly told both sides that he attended St. John's Seminary with the principal defendant, the Rev. Jon C. Martin, and that neither side has objected to his supervision of the case.

''Father Martin was not a friend of this judge and was one of 350 students there at that time,'' the judge wrote. ''This Judge has not talked with, communicated with, or seen Father Martin in 37 years.''

Connolly has been criticized for not recusing himself from trying the lawsuit against Martin and the Archdiocese of Boston brought by victims of Christopher Reardon, a church worker and swim coach who is serving up to 50 years in prison. Martin was Reardon's supervisor at St. Agnes Parish in Middleton when Reardon, a lay youth minister, committed sexual crimes involving 24 boys. Reardon pleaded guilty and was sent to prison last year.

At a hearing in the civil case last week, Connolly vigorously criticized a watershed ruling by his colleague, Superior Court Judge Constance M. Sweeney, that made public church documents relating to its handling of pedophile priests. The records sparked public outrage and plunged the church into its current crisis. During that hearing, Connolly ruled that Martin's lawyer does not have to produce some of Martin's psychiatric records from St. Luke's Institute, a Maryland treatment center for priests suffering from sexual disorders.

Connolly also ordered that three one-page documents regarding Martin's psychiatric treatment be handed over to Jeffrey A. Newman, the victim's lawyer, but ruled that the documents must remain confidential unless they are deemed admissible at the time of trial.

In a ruling issued yesterday, Connolly wrote that because Martin is accused of negligence, not sex abuse, the release of Martin's psychiatric documents to the public would ''be a significant infringement on his right to privacy.''

''This is not a case alleging any improper sexual abuse by Father Martin,'' Connolly wrote. ''It is a straight negligent supervision claim.''

This story ran on page A11 of the Boston Globe on 5/4/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy