Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

March 23
Law's words frame new play

March 2
Wary Catholics return to church

January 25, 2004
Churches report attendance up

January 4, 2004
Dot parish struggles to survive

December 28
Hudson fill-in priest welcomed

December 12
Law prays daily for diocese

November 22
Assignment for Law expected

November 20
Policies on VOTF reconsidered

September 19
Crisis issues in church's future

September 18
Meeting ban at parish is lifted

August 4
O'Malley given warm welcome

August 1
Lawmakers see shades of gray

July 31
An angry protest, and prayers
Voices of protest and support
Three in crowd bound in hope
At BC, optimistic students watch

July 29
Lay group to engage O'Malley

July 24
Many outraged after AG's report

July 21
Law to skip bishop installation

July 18
O'Malley invites Law, victims

July 11
Bishops seek private opinions

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

Judge blasts transcript release

By Michael Rezendes, Globe Staff, 5/17/2002

Suffolk Superior Court Judge Constance M. Sweeney yesterday expressed grave concern over the publication of last Wednesday's pretrial testimony by Cardinal Bernard F. Law in a clergy sexual abuse lawsuit, and sharply admonished the attorney who took responsibility for the release of Law's deposition.

''You really did blow the rule,'' Sweeney said to attorney William H. Gordon, referring to a procedural rule that gives witnesses 30 days to review a deposition transcript and make corrections. ''You blew the rule sky high here and you blew it to the detriment of the defendants.''

Law's deposition May 8 was taken by Gordon and attorney Mitchell Garabedian, who are representing 86 people who have sued Law and other church officials saying they were sexually molested by former priest John J. Geoghan. Geoghan has been convicted of molestation.

The Globe and other news organizations posted transcripts of Law's deposition on Web sites and printed excerpts in newspapers after purchasing the material from a court stenographer.

Yesterday, Sweeney asked stenographer Loretta Hennessey to explain why she sent copies of Law's testimony to news organizations in apparent violation of rule 30. Hennessey said she did so after consulting with Gordon. Gordon said he had misunderstood Sweeney's ruling of last year that lifted a protective order on records in the Geoghan case, and apologized.

Sweeney said she believed it was essential to air her concerns in order to maintain fairness. She said an error seemingly as insignificant as a misplaced comma could alter the meaning of a transcript.

J. Owen Todd, one of Law's attorneys, applauded Sweeney's action. ''It clarified the way the case should be handled procedurally,'' Todd said. ''It shouldn't be handled in the press.''

This story ran on page A26 of the Boston Globe on 5/17/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy