Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

October 25
Victims could now collect

October 2
Geoghan's sister hits guards

October 1
Geoghan's sister to speak

September 27
Conviction erasure protested
Druce is hospitalized again
Guard ad seeks understanding

September 24
Inquiry: Druce beaten as child

September 20
Druce pleads not guilty in slay
Geoghan claims guard assault

September 14
Report says Druce in a rage

September 13
Letter: Druce abused as a boy

September 12
Geoghan bore guards' abuse
Lawyer: Mail deluges accused

September 11
Expanded panel is sought

September 8
Druce is returned from hospital

September 5
Geoghan consultant ties eyed

September 4
Conflict raised on consultant

September 3
Bias concerns raised in probe

September 2
No new panel members seen

August 31
Geoghan panel to expand

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

Judge asked to consolidate abuse cases

By Michael Rezendes, Globe Staff, 5/25/2002

Three lawyers for victims of clergy sexual abuse yesterday asked Superior Court Chief Justice Suzanne DelVecchio to consolidate the pretrial proceedings of all clergy sexual abuse lawsuits filed against Cardinal Bernard F. Law and the Boston Archdiocese.

But another lawyer representing 86 victims of former priest and convicted pedophile John J. Geoghan said he will oppose the request because it could interfere with his effort to have a $15 million to $30 million settlement agreement enforced.

''The 86 Geoghan victims have a unique issue in that they intend to have a hearing relative to enforcement of the settlement agreement, and I intend to oppose the motion,'' said attorney Mitchell Garabedian.

The three lawyers asking for consolidation - Roderick MacLeish Jr., Jeffrey A. Newman, and Carmen L. Durso - made their request in a formal motion, saying that management of the lawsuits by a single judge would reduce costs and ensure that all the cases are conducted under the same legal rulings on a range of issues.

Approximately 500 people claiming that they were sexually abused by priests have hired Boston area attorneys since the clergy sexual abuse scandal erupted in January, according to interviews with lawyers.

MacLeish said the motion to consolidate pretrial proceedings is not intended to undermine Garabedian's effort to win enforcement of the Geoghan settlement agreement. The archdiocese announced the agreement March 12 but reneged this month, saying the agreement would leave the church without enough money to pay additional alleged victims and continue operating.

''We hope the archdiocese honors its commitment to Mitchell's clients but at the same time we want to make sure that cases are processed as quickly and efficiently as possible,'' MacLeish said.

The three lawyers filed their motion one day after an attorney representing two priests in sexual abuse lawsuits delivered a letter to DelVecchio with a similar request.

But the attorney, Timothy P. O'Neill, made reference in his letter to restrictions on public access to pretrial discovery materials that MacLeish and the other two lawyers found objectionable.

''His comments concerning the media are an obvious effort to obtain a blanket gag order on these matters,'' Newman said.

O'Neill on Thursday also filed a motion in Suffolk Superior Court seeking to prevent the public release of documents turned over by the archdiocese in civil lawsuits against the Rev. Jon C. Martin, the former pastor of a Middleton church where convicted pedophile Christopher Reardon was employed as a youth worker.

Michael Rezendes can be reached at rezendes@globe.comStephen Kurkjian of the Globe Staff contributed to this story.

This story ran on page A7 of the Boston Globe on 5/25/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy