Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

April 7
Vt. church in record settlement

March 14
In Albany, bishop profile raised
Book Review: Guard of lies

February 28
Church hierarchy faulted
More than 80% of victims male

February 27
Diocese gives abuse data
Abuse peaked in '60s
2d man to aid Dupre case

February 26
Alleged victim to aid probe

February 24
Sniezyk clarifies his remarks

February 23
Prelate: Harm unrecognized

February 21
Springfield report questioned

February 20
Lawyer: Sermon riled accuser

February 17
4% of priests in US accused

February 12
Bishop resigns after claims

February 6
Arlington priest cited in suit

Earlier stories

Search for:
Time period:

Spotlight Report

Bishop denies abuse allegations; diocese levels countercharge

By Michael Paulson, Globe Staff, 7/13/2002

An auxiliary bishop in Worcester yesterday denied that he molested a teenager four decades ago, and the Worcester diocese accused the complainant of extortion.

Bishop George E. Rueger, 72, said he did not abuse Sime Braio, 52, despite accusations made by Braio in a lawsuit filed Thursday in Worcester Superior Court.

''These allegations are totally unfounded,'' Rueger said at a news conference. ''What the allegation cites some 40 years ago never happened.''

Braio, of Shrewsbury, alleged in the lawsuit that Rueger began to abuse him when Braio was a 13-year-old altar boy at Our Lady of Lourdes Church in Worcester. Braio alleged that the abuse continued when he was a student at the Lyman School for Boys in Westborough, where Braio says he was placed after running away because of the abuse.

Braio said he informed the Diocese of Worcester of his allegation 10 months ago. His decision to file a lawsuit was first reported by the Worcester Telegram & Gazette.

Diocesan officials said they investigated Braio's allegation and determined it to be false. They said they also reported it to Worcester District Attorney John J. Conte. The diocese said Conte did not substantiate the allegation; Conte did not return two calls seeking comment yesterday.

Diocesan spokesman Raymond L. Delisle said Worcester Bishop Daniel P. Reilly does not believe the allegation against Rueger. Delisle said the only time Rueger recalls interacting with Braio was when he once visited him in a hospital, and he said there has never been another abuse allegation against Rueger during his 50 years as a Worcester priest.

The diocesan chancellor, Monsignor Thomas J. Sullivan, accused Braio of extortion, saying that Braio had threatened to talk to the Worcester Telegram unless he was paid money by the diocese. Sullivan said the diocese reported the extortion allegation to State Police.

Braio's lawyer, Daniel J. Shea of Houston, said his client did not try to extort money from the diocese and stands by his allegations.

''I don't believe a single word coming from the mouth of any bishop of the Catholic Church,'' Shea said. ''We found [Braio] to be a very credible witness.''

This story ran on page A16 of the Boston Globe on 7/13/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy