Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

March 11
Victims' lawyer to sue Dupre

March 6
Suit accuses insurer of fraud

March 5
Charges against bishop eyed

March 1
Activists seek sex abuse panel

February 26
Alleged victim to aid probe

February 13
Springfield probe is sought

January 7, 2004
Agents faced reluctant aides

December 3
Church settles with victim

November 15
Settlement fuels money advice

November 12
Claims set aside until 2004

October 30
Hard line set on abuse trials

October 21
Most plaintiffs accept deal

October 19
Therapy sought in abuse suit

October 17
Lawyer says settlement near

October 8
Victims agonize over deal

September 12
Victims seen taking settlement

September 11
Church deal a boon for lawyers

September 10
Church in $85 million accord
Archdiocese facing new strains
Most plaintiffs to accept deal
O'Malley makes an appeal

September 9
Negotiations resume in cases

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

Court grants convicted priest a new trial

By Kathleen Burge, Globe Staff, 10/12/2002

A priest convicted seven years ago of sexually abusing a boy at a Worcester home for troubled teens was granted a new trial by the state Appeals Court yesterday.

The justices ruled that the 1995 trial of the Rev. Joseph A. Fredette was significantly flawed because the judge didn't question a juror when he first acknowledged having seen a television interview with the boy's mother. The court also faulted the prosecutor for improper comments during closing arguments.

Fredette was convicted of three counts of committing unnatural acts for abusing the boy in the 1970s.

The priest was acquitted on charges of abusing another boy at the home. Fredette has been free for more than a year, after serving his four- to five-year sentence, said his lawyer, Alan J. Black.

A spokeswoman for Worcester County District Attorney John Conte said the case was under review and prosecutors were looking at the possibility of appealing yesterday's decision.

Fredette, now 70, was a founder of Come Alive, a home for troubled teens that he ran for the state Department of Youth Services. He fled to Canada in 1974 to avoid sexual assault charges, prosecutors said, and founded a 240-acre hermitage in rural New Brunswick. Fredette was extradited in 1994.

Yesterday, the boy's mother said that her son, now 46, was traumatized by Fredette's abuse. Her son was placed in the care of "Father Joe" after the boy ran away from home, she said.

"It's been terrible," she said. "He's been in and out of jail. Some people say you can't blame everything he's done on [the abuse]. But it does have a lasting effect on him."

She said she wasn't troubled by the decision overturning his conviction because Fredette has already served his time.

The Appeals Court ruled that Superior Court Judge James P. Donohue erred when a juror wrote him a note saying that he had seen a television interview with the alleged victim's mother but was not influenced by it. Jurors are instructed to ignore media accounts of the trial on which they are sitting.

"Well, as long as he doesn't feel that this is swaying him, then it shouldn't sway him," the judge said.

After the jurors convicted Fredette, Donohue polled them on what they had heard about the television interview. "A bunch of people said they heard that from this one juror," Black said.

The judge denied a request for a mistrial. The Appeals Court ruled that "there was a substantial risk that the jury could take the information provided in [the victim's] mother's interview as strongly reinforcing the Commonwealth's portrayal of [the victim] as a relative innocent whose life of crime could be attributed to the defendant's traumatizing sexual abuse."

A prosecutor also erred in closing arguments by offering an "improper opinion" that was not supported by the evidence during the trial, the Appeals Court ruled.

Kathleen Burge can be reached at kburge@globe.com.

This story ran on page B8 of the Boston Globe on 10/12/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy