Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
2014 update: the Globe is launching

Crux, a Catholic news site

Please visit there for continuing Globe coverage of all Catholic issues.
 Latest coverage

April 7
Vt. church in record settlement

March 14
In Albany, bishop profile raised
Book Review: Guard of lies

February 28
Church hierarchy faulted
More than 80% of victims male

February 27
Diocese gives abuse data
Abuse peaked in '60s
2d man to aid Dupre case

February 26
Alleged victim to aid probe

February 24
Sniezyk clarifies his remarks

February 23
Prelate: Harm unrecognized

February 21
Springfield report questioned

February 20
Lawyer: Sermon riled accuser

February 17
4% of priests in US accused

February 12
Bishop resigns after claims

February 6
Arlington priest cited in suit

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

Wrong name attached to charge

By Globe Staff, 1/22/2003

When an Archdiocese of Boston file containing an allegation of sexual misconduct against a priest was made public last Friday, it mistakenly substituted the name of a Jesuit priest for a long-deceased diocesan priest who was accused of the abuse.

Donna M. Morrissey, the spokeswoman for the archdiocese, issued a statement yesterday apologizing to the Rev. James W. O'Neil, S.J. for ''his misidentification and any harm it may have caused.'' O'Neil is in residence at Boston College High School.

O'Neil's name and a one-sentence description of the allegation appeared in an article in the Globe last Saturday about six priests who had been accused of sexual misconduct.

Morrissey said the allegation, made last May by a lawyer on behalf of an alleged victim, actually accused the Rev. William J. O'Neill, who was assigned to Immaculate Conception Church in Everett in 1957 when the sexual abuse allegedly occurred. O'Neill died in 1960, according to Morrissey.

In the file, the letter from the attorney identifies the alleged molester only as ''Father O'Neil,'' omitting the final ''l'' on his surname. The two other pages accompanying the letter are a cover sheet labeled ''Rev. James O'Neil'' and a short synopsis of the Jesuit priest's assignments, including one in the 1960s to Immaculate Conception Church, the Jesuit parish in Boston's South End.

An attempt by the Globe last Friday to locate the Jesuit priest was unavailing.

Last month, the archdiocese made a similar error when it included in a file on Rev. Richard J. Ahern, a Stigmatine priest accused of sexual abuse, pages from the personnel records of two diocesan priests, one dead and one who left the priesthood. Neither of the two faced any charges, but they had almost identical names to the Stigmatine priest.

This story ran on page A10 of the Boston Globe on 1/22/2003.
© Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy