Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

April 2
Springfield bishop apologizes

March 19
Priests named to guide church

March 10
New bishops for two dioceses

February 24
Sniezyk clarifies his remarks

February 23
Prelate: Harm unrecognized

January 15, 2004
O'Malley vows to help victims

January 11, 2004
Study faults Melkite church

January 7, 2004
Audit finds safeguards working
Boston's inquiry presses on
Agents faced reluctant aides

January 6, 2004
Church could defrock priests

November 30
Morrisey reflects on scandal

November 20
Policies on VOTF reconsidered

NOvember 13
Bishops affirm sex teachings

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

Sniezyk seeks to clarify remarks

Flatly condemns abuse by priests

By Globe Staff, 2/24/2004


Monsignor Richard S. Sniezyk (AP Photo)

 Related stories
2/23/2004
Monsignor says harm of abuse wasn't recognized

Denying that sexual misconduct by priests was ever acceptable, Monsignor Richard S. Sniezyk apologized yesterday for comments he made during the weekend that suggested otherwise.

Sniezyk, who was appointed temporary leader of the Diocese of Springfield after its bishop resigned amid sexual abuse allegations, said in an interview with the Globe on Sunday the sexual abuse scandal that has rocked the Catholic Church stemmed from a belief among some priests during the 1960s, '70s, and '80s that sex with young men was OK.

Yesterday, Sniezyk sought to clarify the comments. "Let me be clear and unequivocal, I did not mean to suggest, nor do I believe to be true, that sexual misconduct in any context is ever acceptable. Clearly, those who have preyed upon our children have justified their actions in many different ways, including the delusion that they, the abusers, were not harming the children, when in fact they were causing great and long-term harm.

"They clearly benefited from a society that set the priesthood apart and allowed abusers to go unchallenged in a behavior, which today clearly would be recognized as wrong," Sniezyk said in a statement. "While it is important to note how abusers acted and how they may have escaped notice, it is more important to condemn the result of their actions -- the terrible and sickening violation of children and the long-term horrific results."

Sniezyk added that most priests have never violated their vows.

"I am deeply sorry if my comments, as well intended as they may have been to present possible answers to the questions I have been asked, caused distress to the faithful or unnecessary and unfounded suspicion of the priests of my diocese. In fact, as I have specifically stated the priesthood has become more sensitive to these issues in the last 20 years as we have learned more about the causes and effects of sexual abuse of minors.

"Together we remain committed to coming to grips with the abuse crisis and then, with these hard lessons learned, move ahead and re-earn the trust of the faithful, especially victims and their families."

Sniezyk is expected to lead the Springfield Diocese until the Vatican chooses a new bishop to replace Thomas L. Dupre. On Feb. 11, Dupre resigned after being confronted with allegations that he had sexually abused two boys in the late 1970s and early 1980s.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy