Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

October 25
Victims could now collect

October 2
Geoghan's sister hits guards

October 1
Geoghan's sister to speak

September 27
Conviction erasure protested
Druce is hospitalized again
Guard ad seeks understanding

September 24
Inquiry: Druce beaten as child

September 20
Druce pleads not guilty in slay
Geoghan claims guard assault

September 14
Report says Druce in a rage

September 13
Letter: Druce abused as a boy

September 12
Geoghan bore guards' abuse
Lawyer: Mail deluges accused

September 11
Expanded panel is sought

September 8
Druce is returned from hospital

September 5
Geoghan consultant ties eyed

September 4
Conflict raised on consultant

September 3
Bias concerns raised in probe

September 2
No new panel members seen

August 31
Geoghan panel to expand

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

Geoghan panel will be expanded

Guards union, activists question current makeup

By Sean P. Murphy and Anne Barnard, Globe Staff, 8/31/2003

 Related stories
Geoghan killed
10/2/2003
Geoghan's sister criticizes guards

10/1/2003
Geoghan's sister to speak

9/27/2003
Victims protest conviction erasure
Druce is hospitalized again
Guards' ad seeks understanding

9/24/2003
Inquiry: Druce beaten as a child

9/20/2003
Druce pleads not guilty to killing
Geoghan claimed guard assault

9/14/2003
Report describes Druce in a rage

9/13/2003
Letter says Druce abused as boy

9/12/2003
Inmate: Geoghan bore abuse
Lawyer: Mail deluging accused

9/11/2003
Expanded Geoghan panel sought

9/8/2003
Druce is returned from hospital

9/7/2003
McNamara: A back-page death

9/5/2003
Geoghan consultant's ties eyed
McGrory: Romney can do better

9/4/2003
Conflict issue raised on consultant

9/3/2003
Bias concerns are raised in probe

9/2/2003
No new members seen for panel

8/31/2003
Geoghan panel will be expanded

8/29/2003
Group assails prison guards
Geoghan is buried in Brookline
Op-Ed: Geoghan's 'innocence'

8/28/2003
Priest in 'aggressive' case unit
Records show Druce as deviant
Voiding of record is challenged

8/27/2003
Bid to keep Geoghan at Concord
Geoghan's death voids conviction
Prison units see volatile mixes
US attorney won't rush decision

8/26/2003
Monthlong plot to kill Geoghan
Alleged killer led troubled life

8/25/2003
Geoghan was tied and beaten
Death doesn't end victim suffering
Similiarities in suspect's '88 crime
Priest seen as a prison target

8/24/2003
Geoghan is strangled in prison
A troubled life exploiting vocation

 Documents
Geoghan case letters, documents
Law deposition in Geoghan case

 From the archives
Key stories in the Geoghan case

1/6/2003
Church allowed abuse for years

1/19/2002
Geoghan found guilty of sex abuse

2/22/2002
Geoghan receives 9-10 years

5/9/2002
Law recalls little on Geoghan case

9/19/2002
Geoghan victims settle for $10m

 Complete coverage
The John Geoghan case

As lawyers, prisoners' advocates, and the prison guards' union question the independence of the state-appointed panel slated to investigate the prison death of former priest John J. Geoghan, the Romney administration says it plans to add at least one new member with no ties to state law enforcement agencies.

David Shaw, a spokesman for the state Executive Office of Public Safety, said new members would be added to the current panel, including at least one who has no ties to his office or the state Department of Correction.

The current panel includes Mark Delaney, a State Police major; Mark Reilly, the Department of Correction's chief of investigations; and George Camp, a corrections consultant who advises prison systems in other states and has a consulting contract, through a federal grant, with a national organization that does corrections work for states, including Massachusetts.

''I have no reason to question the good faith of three individuals, but what they've put together is essentially an internal investigation within the Department of Public Safety,'' said John Reinstein, legal director of the Massachusetts chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.

The makeup of the panel also was criticized by a spokesman for the 5,000-member correctional officers union, who said it has ''a management slant.''

''The union would support a truly independent probe,'' said Stephen Crawford of the Massachusetts Correctional Officers Federated Union.

Shaw said the Romney administration is ''very aware'' of concerns about the panel's composition, but said it did not prompt the decision to add new members. He said Public Safety Secretary Edward A. Flynn mentioned plans to expand the panel in a news conference earlier this week, and had told Shaw in a private conversation that he intended to add an independent member.

An administration official familiar with discussions involving the panel's composition said officials have understood ''there was a problem'' with the panel's lack of independence.

''It's still in the very early organizational stages,'' the official, who asked not to be identified, said of the panel. ''They're grappling with how to do this. Everyone wants answers right now. But it's going to take time.''

The official said one possibility is to break the panel's mission into two parts: finding out what happened in the Geoghan slaying, and making recommendations for policy changes in the state prison system. Outsiders may be brought into the process in the recommendation phase, the official said.

Geoghan was serving a nine- to 10-year sentence for molesting a 10-year-old boy. Allegations that he sexually assaulted nearly 150 youngsters helped spark the clergy sexual abuse scandal that rocked the Catholic Church and led to the resignation of Cardinal Bernard Law late last year.

Geoghan was beaten and strangled Aug. 23 in his cell in a maximum-security protective custody unit at Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center. Authorities say he was killed by Joseph L. Druce, a convicted killer. Geoghan was transferred to Souza-Baranowski in April from a minimum-security protective unit at MCI-Concord, where his lawyers allege that prison guards harassed him so severely, even defecating on his bed, that the former priest welcomed the move.

State legislators are considering conducting an independent investigation, said one lawmaker, speaking on condition of anonymity. The legislator said the House Post Audit and Oversight Committee has asked the Department of Correction for information to help determine whether to launch its own probe.

John Fulton, chief of staff for the committee's chairman, Representative James H. Fagan, said the committee does not confirm or deny the existence of ongoing investigations. In general, he said, it ''looks at systemic problems that may exist in a state agency.''

Questions remain about who will wield clout on the panel appointed by Romney. The ACLU's Reinstein and others said independent voices could be drowned out if a majority of members have state ties. Shaw said that Flynn, the public safety secretary, would have the final say on the panel's composition and the scope of its investigation.

Shaw said the investigation will look not just at how Geoghan ended up in the same protective custody unit with Druce, but also at Geoghan's time at MCI-Concord and the alleged abuse there.

The panel's mandate to dig into allegations of misconduct by prison employees is all the more reason for it to be led by outsiders, Reinstein said, adding that once the Romney administration decided not to handle the episode through the Correction Department's internal investigation system, the inclusion of Reilly ''is somewhat surprising.''

Shaw said Reilly was included to ''help facilitate the investigation from inside the Department of Correction.'' Shaw added that the State Police have no vested interest in the outcome of the probe, and that Flynn ''is confident in Major Delaney's ability to conduct and lead a fair and unbiased investigation.''

Although the State Police is separate from the Department of Correction, both agencies are overseen by the Executive Office of Public Safety, headed by Flynn.

Delaney has 29 years experience as an investigator in the attorney general's office, the Middlesex district attorney's office, and in his current assignment as head of the State Police's forensic services. He said Flynn gave him a single order: ''Find the facts.''

''I'm out to find out how these two inmates wound up in the same cell, what policies, decisions or events along the way put them in that cell together,'' he said in a telphone interview yesterday.

Delaney said he was aware of doubts publicly expressed about the panel's independence. ''I can assure you: we are professional, experienced fact-finders,'' he said. He added that he is still in the process of adding ''hand-picked'' investigators from the State Police ranks to the panel's staff.

''We are out to separate fact from fiction. Or goal is an honest, fair, and objective evaluation,'' he said.

Shaw called Camp ''an independent corrections expert'' and said his appointment ''demonstrates our commitment to bringing in outside ideas and voices.''

Shaw said Camp is well known to state correction officials because he and his company, Criminal Justice Institute of Middletown, Conn., have provided consulting services to the state under grants from the National Institute of Corrections, which is funded by the federal government and consults with states, including Massachusetts. He said Camp has no contracts directly with the state.

Camp did not return calls seeking comment. Requests for an interview with Reilly submitted to the corrections department went unanswered.

Jack Levin, director of the Brudnick Center on Violence at Northeastern University, said Camp's level of independence would depend on his record and willingness to call for reform. He said it was appropriate to include both members of the prison system and outsiders, but added: ''Review boards of all kinds are suspect when they consist of members of the same profession they're evaluating. For the sake of objectivity and balance you would hope that at least one of the members has no connections at all to corrections.''

Levin said that regardless of the panel's makeup, it will face a challenge in coming up with ways to improve the prison system, where there are no easy answers and not enough money.

Even the narrowest issue the panel faces -- how to better run protective custody units, which include the prisoners most despised by other inmates, such as child molesters and informers -- is thorny, he said.

''It's almost impossible to supervise an inmate every moment, 24 hours a day, without imposing solitary confinement . . . a very severe punishment in itself,'' he said. ''So most prisoners would opt to take a risk.''

Marc R. Pacheco, who chairs the Senate Post Audit and Oversight Committee, has asked the panel to brief him on the probe.

''Would I prefer a move independent investigation? Yeah, sure,'' Pacheco said. ''But at least for right now, we are giving them the benefit of the doubt.''

Howard Friedman, the lawyer who represented prisoners allegedly beaten by Suffolk County guards at Nashua Street Jail, called for the panel to include an ACLU lawyer, criminal defense lawyer, or other nongovernment lawyer.

''You want to have people who have as their point of view to look under the rocks and try to criticize, and not try to justify,'' he said.

Sean Murphy can be reached at smurphy@globe.com. Anne Barnard can be reached at abarnard@globe.com.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy