Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

October 25
Victims could now collect

October 2
Geoghan's sister hits guards

October 1
Geoghan's sister to speak

September 27
Conviction erasure protested
Druce is hospitalized again
Guard ad seeks understanding

September 24
Inquiry: Druce beaten as child

September 20
Druce pleads not guilty in slay
Geoghan claims guard assault

September 14
Report says Druce in a rage

September 13
Letter: Druce abused as a boy

September 12
Geoghan bore guards' abuse
Lawyer: Mail deluges accused

September 11
Expanded panel is sought

September 8
Druce is returned from hospital

September 5
Geoghan consultant ties eyed

September 4
Conflict raised on consultant

September 3
Bias concerns raised in probe

September 2
No new panel members seen

August 31
Geoghan panel to expand

Earlier stories

Spotlight Report

Bias concerns are raised in Geoghan probe

By Sean P. Murphy, Globe Staff, 9/3/2003

 Related stories
Geoghan killed
10/2/2003
Geoghan's sister criticizes guards

10/1/2003
Geoghan's sister to speak

9/27/2003
Victims protest conviction erasure
Druce is hospitalized again
Guards' ad seeks understanding

9/24/2003
Inquiry: Druce beaten as a child

9/20/2003
Druce pleads not guilty to killing
Geoghan claimed guard assault

9/14/2003
Report describes Druce in a rage

9/13/2003
Letter says Druce abused as boy

9/12/2003
Inmate: Geoghan bore abuse
Lawyer: Mail deluging accused

9/11/2003
Expanded Geoghan panel sought

9/8/2003
Druce is returned from hospital

9/7/2003
McNamara: A back-page death

9/5/2003
Geoghan consultant's ties eyed
McGrory: Romney can do better

9/4/2003
Conflict issue raised on consultant

9/3/2003
Bias concerns are raised in probe

9/2/2003
No new members seen for panel

8/31/2003
Geoghan panel will be expanded

8/29/2003
Group assails prison guards
Geoghan is buried in Brookline
Op-Ed: Geoghan's 'innocence'

8/28/2003
Priest in 'aggressive' case unit
Records show Druce as deviant
Voiding of record is challenged

8/27/2003
Bid to keep Geoghan at Concord
Geoghan's death voids conviction
Prison units see volatile mixes
US attorney won't rush decision

8/26/2003
Monthlong plot to kill Geoghan
Alleged killer led troubled life

8/25/2003
Geoghan was tied and beaten
Death doesn't end victim suffering
Similiarities in suspect's '88 crime
Priest seen as a prison target

8/24/2003
Geoghan is strangled in prison
A troubled life exploiting vocation

 Documents
Geoghan case letters, documents
Law deposition in Geoghan case

 From the archives
Key stories in the Geoghan case

1/6/2003
Church allowed abuse for years

1/19/2002
Geoghan found guilty of sex abuse

2/22/2002
Geoghan receives 9-10 years

5/9/2002
Law recalls little on Geoghan case

9/19/2002
Geoghan victims settle for $10m

 Complete coverage
The John Geoghan case

The corrections consultant tapped by the Romney administration to serve on a three-member panel investigating the death of defrocked priest John J. Geoghan authored a report that was harshly criticized last year by a federal judge as "biased" and "misleading."

As the court case was publicized yesterday by a prisoners' advocacy group, the cochairmen of the Legislature's Committee on Public Safety announced they would conduct hearings on Geoghan's death once the state Executive Office of Public Safety concludes its investigation.

Senator Jarrett T. Barrios, a Cambridge Democrat, said he called Public Safety Secretary Edward A. Flynn yesterday to invite him to present the panel's work, once completed, to the committee. He declined to say what Flynn said, and a spokeswoman for Flynn said she did not know what the secretary thought of a legislative role in the Geoghan case.

Barrios said he and Representative Timothy J. Toomey Jr., a Cambridge Democrat who is the committee's cochairman, agreed to call academics, Massachusetts Correctional Legal Services, and others to appear at the hearing and scrutinize the panel's work.

"We're are going to look at all their work very carefully," Toomey said.

In a March 2002 ruling excluding reports prepared by prison consultant George Camp in a case brought by an inmate, Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald criticized a survey Camp conducted as part of his research as "biased," and found that "not only are Camp's conclusions baseless, the graphs and charts he created . . . are misleading and are thoroughly unhelpful."

Camp, a former New York state corrections official and a longtime consultant to corrections officials in many states, did not return telephone calls yesterday seeking comment on last year's federal court case.

A spokeswoman for the Executive Office of Public Safety, which is overseeing the Geoghan investigation, declined to comment, saying she was unfamiliar with the case.

In a prepared statement, Massachusetts Correctional Legal Services said, "The panel that Governor Romney has appointed is unacceptable," and called for "a genuinely independent and credible panel that the public can confidently assume will conduct a thorough investigation."

In last year's US District Court case, Camp's report was offered as evidence to defend the New York Department of Correctional Services in a lawsuit filed by an inmate who challenged a ban of literature on a religious group known as the Nation of Gods and Earths, or the Five-Percenters.

The New York prison administrators contended that the group was a dangerous "gang," and that recognition of it as legitimate was a threat to prison security.

Camp's report was submitted to back up the prison administrator's position by suggesting that fewer incidents of disruption occurred following the ban. His report analyzed thousands of incident reports provided by New York prison administrators and included a survey of the administrators.

Buchwald called that survey biased and quoted from Camp's letter in her decision: "Dear Members, we need your help. We are defending the NYS Department of Correctional Services in a case that involves their policy on intercepting Five-Percenter literature. Your answers to the following questions will be helpful to us in preparing a defense."

"The trustworthiness of survey evidence depends in part on an assurance of objectivity in the information gathering process," Buchwald wrote. Camp's survey, she added, was "subjective and biased, and results therefore do not bear the indicia of trustworthiness."

Buchwald also criticized Camp's analysis of incident reports. "We conclude that the conclusions drawn in the Camp report are both misleading and based on unreliable methodology," she wrote.

The Romney administration, in launching an investigation of Geoghan's Aug. 23 death in a protective custody unit at Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center, has said Camp's inclusion on the three-member investigative panel gave an "independent" voice to the group.

Lawyers, prisoners' advocates, and the prison guards' union have criticized the composition of the panel, calling it an in-house investigation. Besides Camp, the panel includes Mark Delaney, a State Police major, and Mark Reilly, head of investigations for the Department of Correction. Although the State Police and the Department of Correction are separate agencies, they are overseen by the Executive Office of Public Safety.

The 2002 federal court case was found by James R. Pingeon, litigation director of Massachusetts Correctional Legal Services.

"Biased and unreliable is not a stamp of approval," he said.

The organization also described cases involving five inmates whose abuse was abetted by guards. The cases, which do not include names of those inmates making the allegations, depict guards as encouraging and even "paying" inmates in cigarettes to attack and beat other inmates.

Justin Latini, a Department of Correction spokesman, said he had not seen the allegations and declined to comment.

Sean P. Murphy can be reached at smurph@globe.com.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy