|
|
The applicantsCollege graduate
Technology professional
Financial services
Biotech professional
Legal secretary
Social sector
The experts
Tom Egan is vice president of talent acquisition for Veritude, a staffing service specializing in IT and professional staffing. He has had 16 years of experience in the technical staffing industry. Since joining Veritude seven years ago, Tom has helped in developing the strategy for — and recruiting methodologies of — the companys Talent Acquisition Group.
Randy Stevens is the president and CEO of R L. Stevens and Associates Inc., based out of Waltham. R.L. Stevens is a national firm specializing in career management by helping professionals and executives pinpoint the right career opportunities and increase their market exposure to employers.
Radhika Rana, CSP, is a recruiting supervisor at Professional Staffing Group (PSG), one of the largest staffing firms in Massachusetts. In addition to managing PSGs recruiting division, Radhika assists non-profits, such as The Asian American Civic Association, with resume critiquing and mock interviews.
|
What the professionals had to say ...11. Does the person provide enough information about their past or not enough? What should they have left out or included in their résumé?Egan: Yes, enough information is provided, yet not too much. I noted that the candidate has provided only the last 18 years of her work experience and in the additional data provided on the candidate, perhaps she has additional work experience. However, her work experience prior to 1992 may not be relevant to a network manager. Stevens: The candidate is in her mid-50s years old but shows only 12 years of experience. A better approach would have included a line in the qualifications summary that stated: Network and information systems professional with over 15 years accomplishments in (then detail remaining summary). Her professional experience abruptly ends at 12 years. A better approach could be an overview such as: Prior to 1996 accomplishments focused in these areas: (then name them). 12. What is the résumés greatest flaw?Egan: The greatest flaw is in the design. I would definitely change the order of the candidate's credentials presenting her summary of qualifications first followed by her knowledge base (technical skills). I would then immediately follow that with her "professional experience" and move her education, specialized certifications, and specialized training to the end of the résumé. Stevens: The résumé fails to show any kind of differentiation over her competition and doesn't answer the questions, "What can you do for me?" and "Why should I interview you, over someone else?" Rana: The dates for the first two jobs are a little off. If the candidate fixes the margins so that all of the dates are all in one line the résumé would be flawless. 13. What is the best feature of the résumé?Egan: The BEST feature is the content of the "knowledge base" section (I would change the section heading name from "knowledge base" to "technical skills".) Stevens: The résumé does show the depth and breadth of the candidate's knowledge and competency. Rana: The best feature of the candidate's résumé is the first page. I really liked all of her skills and education information on the first page and the employment history following. 14. Does the person successfully sell themselves? What did they fail to do?Egan: This résumé is certainly adequate. The candidate needs to be more concise about her professional experience as stated in question 3. She needs to use more bullet facts about her actual experience. Stevens: No, because the résumé is so responsibilities-oriented instead of showcasing how her contributions affected organizational performance, efficiency, productivity, decision support efforts, and internal /external customer experience. Rana: The candidate does successfully sell herself to the employer. 15. Additional commentsEgan: Based on the qualifications presented, I would definitely call the candidate for a follow-up if I had a need for a network manager. Just change the order of the sections and be more concise. Also, when interviewing, just because you have all of your credentials on your résumé, do not assume that the interviewer has read everything. In a competitive market, be ready to market yourself and your experience. Good luck to the candidate! Stevens: Yes. There are numerous small, but noticeable missteps in how she has written the résumé. These show a lack of attention-to-detail or ignorance of the basics of a well-written document. This could harm opportunity to gain a quality interview. Some examples and suggestions:
|
The applicantsWe took résumés from six different people looking for jobs and asked professionals to give us their opinion. See what they had to say. |
![]() Legal secretary |
![]() Financial services |

















