The other day, I came across the acronym homes, which is supposed to help you remember the five Great Lakes.
I'd completely forgotten about homes. The truth is, I don't think about the Great Lakes as often as I should—they're obviously important, why else did we memorize them?
But even after I saw homes, I still couldn't name them all. I decided to do some research.
"Can you name the Great Lakes?" I asked my wife.
She proceeded to rattle off all five.
"How'd you do that?" I asked.
"Simple," she said. "Homes."
Clearly, some acronyms work for some people.
My problem with homes is that it's got nothing to do with lakes, unless your home is completely flooded—"Let's get out of here, honey, all the rooms are like lakes!"—or you happen to live in a houseboat.
An acronym for the Great Lakes should be relevant, like water, or drown. Either one would work just fine, we'd simply have to re-name most of the lakes to fit.
That's the thing about acronyms, they're often a force fit.
My favorite business acronym, smart, spells out five criteria for an effective goal. No force fit there; smart goals sound right, and are used everywhere (although the criteria vary across organizations; e.g. the a in smart can mean attainable, or agreed-upon, or awesome).
MADD, mothers against drunk driving, works despite the misspelling. MADD is emotional, which makes it memorable, and the emotion fits the crime.
I also have a soft spot for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are creative acronyms—nicknames really—that sound less like mortgage agencies, and more like a pleasant couple you'd meet at a square dance. Perhaps near the Great Lakes.
But in general, the world is cluttered with acronyms. Over 5 million, according to acronymfinder.com. Pick up any business book, you're bound to run into some bad ones.
I've created a few iffy ones myself. If you're a consultant (as I am), there's a law, I believe, that requires you to produce them.
Let's say you wanted to build a consulting practice around eliminating acronyms. You'd probably end up creating one anyway, despite yourself—why not EAT (end acronyms today)—and then you'd turn that into a book: EAT! The Shocking, 30 Day Diet to a Slimmer, Less Annoying, Verbal You.
Well, you get the point. Use acronyms sparingly. Not everyone loves them, and some people, when they hear one, just don't feel at homes.
© Copyright 2013 Paul Hellman. All rights reserved.
The author is solely responsible for the content.
about this blog
e-mail your question
Meet the Jobs Docs
Patricia Hunt Sinacole is president of First Beacon Group LLC, a human resources consulting firm in Hopkinton. She works with clients across many industries including technology, biotech and medical devices, financial services, and healthcare, and has over 20 years of human resources experience.
Elaine Varelas is managing partner at Keystone Partners, a career management firm in Boston and serves on the board of Career Partners International.
Cindy Atoji Keene is a freelance journalist with more than 25 years experience. E-mail her directly here.
Peter Post is the author of "The Etiquette Advantage in Business." Email questions about business etiquette to him directly here.
Stu Coleman, a partner and general manager at WinterWyman, manages the firm's Financial Contracting division, and provides strategic staffing services to Boston-area organizations needing Accounting and Finance workforce solutions and contract talent.
Tracy Cashman is a partner and the general manager of the Information Technology search division at WinterWyman. She has 20 years of experience partnering with clients in the Boston area to conduct technology searches in a wide variety of industries and technology.
Paul Hellman is the founder of Express Potential, which specializes in executive communication skills. He consults and speaks internationally on how to capture attention & influence others. Email him directly here.