< Back to front page Text size +

Oh no, she didn't!

Posted by Courtney Hollands  September 17, 2007 04:02 PM
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

There was a rather interesting article profiling Rachel Zoe in Sunday's New York Times Magazine. Though Lynn Hirschberg provided juicy -- and/or troubling -- insight into Zoe's life and how the starved stylist single-handedly conducts celebrity and tabloid fashion, the most controversial lines came from Miss Thang herself:

"Anna Wintour is one of my heroes, but they say that I’m more influential. As great as it is, Vogue won’t change a designer’s business. But if an unknown brand is worn by a certain person in a tabloid, it will be the biggest designer within a week."

I wonder what the Vogue editrix thought of that little quote. Unfortunately, Zoe's ability to churn out teeny-weeny, bug-eyed, bejeweled starlets in her image (Hello, Nicole Richie! We're talking about you, Lohan!) does affect the celebrity fashion landscape and probably influences tweens to lose weight and spend gobs of money on designer jeans. But no one messes with Anna Wintour. No one.

vs.jpg
[Zoe vs. Wintour: Coming soon to a fashion show near you. Bangs will fly.]

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

ABOUT STYLEPHILE The Globe's Style writers dish about home design, fashion, and celebrity style.

Contributors

Christopher Muther (@chris_muther) writes for the Globe's Style section.

Hayley Kaufman is editor of the Style section.

Rachel Raczka (@rachelraczka) is the lifestyle producer for Boston.com.

archives

browse this blog

by category