< Back to front page Text size +

Why so serious, Scarlett?

Posted by Courtney Hollands  March 25, 2009 05:29 PM
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Oh, mon dieu. I inadvertently mixed up my lousy actors the other day. Scarlett is married to Ryan Reynolds, not Josh Hartnett. I knew that, but sometimes my fingers fly away from me. Thanks for reading and commenting, Coleen!

I don't have a problem with the dress Scar-Jo wore to the Moet and Chandon: A Tribute to Cinema party last night, per se. It's not really crisp and bubbly — it's much more brut and boring. And, in some photos, the slit in the front gives the illusion that her hem is tucked between her gams. On the whole, though, it fits well and has intriguing scalloped detail:

scarjo1.jpg

But — and this is a big but — I just don't get Mrs. Reynolds's new Vampy McVamperstein of Vampyland look. She's a cross between Dita Von Teese (from the Marilyn Manson years — shudder) and Jessica Rabbit. Seriously. No 24-year-old needs this much makeup:

scarjo2.jpg

"I am Scarlett, Woody Allen's eye candy. My hair is now auburn and my always-parted lips match my name. Sayonara, blond bombshell Scarlett: the new serious actress Scarlett is moving in. It's my party, and I will Spackle my face with makeup if I want to. Capiche?"

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

ABOUT STYLEPHILE The Globe's Style writers dish about home design, fashion, and celebrity style.

Contributors

Christopher Muther (@chris_muther) writes for the Globe's Style section.

Hayley Kaufman is editor of the Style section.

Rachel Raczka (@rachelraczka) is the lifestyle producer for Boston.com.

archives

browse this blog

by category