< Back to Front Page Text size +

One of these things is just like the other

Posted by Devra First May 23, 2008 02:51 PM

Chick-fil-A's classic chicken sandwich:

chickfil.jpg

Description: "A boneless breast of chicken seasoned to perfection, hand-breaded, pressure-cooked in peanut oil and served on a toasted, buttered bun with dill pickle chips. Also available with lettuce and tomato."

McDonald's brand new Southern Style Chicken Sandwich:

mcdochix.jpg

Description: "All hail, the perfect sandwich. So simple, so juicy, so perfectly seasoned, lightly breaded all white meat chicken topped with two pickles and served on an oh, so steamy buttery tasting bun."

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
8 comments so far...
  1. There is no way the McDonald's chicken sandwich is as good as the original. First, they don't cook it in peanut oil. That makes a huge difference in the flavor. Second, no way the bun is as good, guarantee they will just put these on the same buns they use for the cheeseburgers. Third, McDonalds [EDITED:] stinks...

    Posted by Bill May 25, 08 01:21 PM
  1. Chick-Fil-A hasn't anything to be worried about. The MickieDee's sandwich isn't bad at all but it doesn't have the Chick-Fil-A seasoning, crispiness and, most imporantly, those pickles! The Mickie biscuit used for the chix and biscuits is excellent, a really good biscuit, but the fowl still lacks that Chick-Fil-A pizzazzzz.

    Posted by Tim May 25, 08 08:35 PM
  1. Ok. No taste comparison? Chik-fil-a is GREAT, how is Mcdoogles copy?

    Posted by izzy May 26, 08 04:04 PM
  1. No, no, NO!

    Chik-fil-A is a little slice of heaven on a bun, and the reason I've made twice-monthly trips to Burlington Mall ever since moving here 4 years ago from the home of Chik-fil-A, Atlanta.

    I tried one of the Mc-Not-so-Fast chicken sandwiches, and they're not the same -- a pale substitute, acceptable only if you've never had, or can't get, the original.

    It's like Coca-Cola and my grandmother's biscuits -- you can't replicate perfection.

    Posted by Allison Weaver May 26, 08 07:23 PM
  1. They're obviously different. McDonald's puts the pickles on top of the chicken. Also, their bun is only butter-tasting.

    Posted by Randy May 27, 08 06:07 AM
  1. As a native southerner, I can tell you they are NOT the same. But I can appreciate McDonald's efforts in bringing a taste of home up north. For a full-on southern experience, get the biscuit. Somehow it's better than the sandwich.

    Posted by Amy R. May 27, 08 01:29 PM
  1. I tried the McD's one on free sandwich day.

    Found some gristle in it. Some bloody gristle.


    No thank you. First time I was in a fast food chain in years. Thanks to gristle, it'll be the last, too.

    Posted by JW Donovan May 27, 08 05:31 PM
  1. I tried the chicken sandwich and I was not impressed at all. The sandwich was hot but tasteless. The bun was unimpressive, and the only reason that I ate the sandwich was because I was hungry. One more question: why are the fries so salty? There's enough salt on them to season an entire batch of chicken.

    Posted by Bert Tryals May 31, 08 07:17 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Dishing What's cooking in the world of food.
contributors
Sheryl Julian, the Globe's Food Editor, writes regularly for the Food section.
Devra First is the Globe's food reporter and restaurant critic. Her reviews appear weekly in the Food section.
Ann Cortissoz is on the staff of the Globe and writes the First Draft beer column for the Food section.
Stephen Meuse writes about wine for the Globe's Food section. His column on Plonk ($12 and under wines) appears on the last Wednesday of the month.
archives

browse this blog

by category