< Back to front page Text size +

Yes, we have no jalapenos

Posted by Devra First  July 24, 2008 03:39 PM
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Now that jalapenos are said to be the culprit in the recent salmonella outbreak, rather than tomatoes, we have a new food to freak out about.

Duly, the country's biggest traditional grocery chain, Kroger, has removed them from its stores. All of them. Even though none of its jalapenos came from Agricola Zaragoza, the Texas distributor whose jalapeno supply included one pepper contaminated with salmonella.




jalapeno.jpg



But we look so innocent!



From Kroger's point of view, better safe than sorry. From the jalapeno farmers' point of view, though, this must feel like rather unfair targeting. The tomato industry reportedly lost more than $100 million due to the salmonella outbreak. Of course the finding of salmonella must be taken seriously, but one little jalapeno will mean big losses for many. And removing all jalapenos removes consumer choice -- at those stores, there's no decision for shoppers to make; it's been made for them. (Though they can choose to shop elsewhere.)

Where do you fall on the better-safe-than-sorry vs. consumer-choice-above-all spectrum? Should it be up to grocery stores to protect their shoppers, or does change need to come from higher up the food chain -- the FDA, CDC, Congress? Or should we all just go off the grid and start growing our own vegetables?

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

1 comments so far...
  1. As a culinary professional and one who enjoys jalapenos in some foods, I think it should entirely be up to the consumer if they choose to buy and consume jalapenos and other potentially hazardous food products.

    A simple warning next to such produce should suffice to warn the general population and let them choose for themselves. We put them on the menus next to potentially hazardous foods that we serve in restaurants... why not the grocery stores?

    Educate the consumer, don't make them ignorant and take away their choices!

    Posted by Travis Royer July 24, 08 07:13 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Dishing

What's cooking in the world of food.

Contributors

Sheryl Julian, the Globe's Food Editor, writes regularly for the Food section.

Devra First is the Globe's food reporter and restaurant critic. Her reviews appear weekly in the Food section.

Stephen Meuse writes and blogs about wine. His column, By the Glass, appears on the last Wednesday of the month in the Food section. Plonkapalooza, his review of 50 bottles $12 and under, comes out every fall.
 

The Recipe Box Project:

If you want to contribute a recipe to The Recipe Box Project, please write it below. Also tell us where you got it (package box, cookbook, mom, friend -- include the name). We're looking for the kinds of dishes that people grew up on, that were served at family suppers, that tell a story, that are typically New England, or that you brought with you from a far away place to New England. We will print one of the recipes in the Food section once a month. To ask any questions, write to Debra Samuels, who is overseeing this project, at recipebox@globe.com. To discuss your recipes, click here.
Required
Required
archives