When a gas guzzler can be good for the environment
It's a critical question these days on any car lot: How many miles per gallon does a vehicle get?
But a new report out in the journal Science today says that's not the right question. We really should be asking how many gallons per mile the car gets.
That's because people often believe the amount of fuel a car uses decreases at an even rate as miles per gallons improve. While that feels intuitive, it's not as easy as that, says Duke University researchers Richard P. Larrick and Jack B. Soll.
![]() Can a hybrid SUV save the environment? |
Consider: Swapping a 34 MPG car with a 50 MPG car would save about 94 gallons for every 10,000 miles driven. But switching a 18 MPG car with a 28 MPG one saves 198 gallons.
It turns out small gains in the biggest gas guzzlers might be helping the environment more than people think.
The two researchers ran a series of experiments with people who were presented with a series of car choices and asked to pick which ones would result in the greatest gains in fuel efficiency. Participants were not able to easily identify the correct choice when given miles per gallon. But they chose correctly when presented with gallons per mile.
That's not to say everyone should go out and buy a SUV hybrid.
Of course, the environment would benefit the most if everyone was driving Priuses, the researchers note. But it does indicate U.S. drivers may be underestimating the real value of getting the worst gas-guzzling cars off the road.
Larrick and Soll want car manufacturers and consumer magazines to start posting and talking about fuel efficiency in gallons per mile so consumers can make better decisions about car purchases and environmental impacts.
"For family and other owners of more than one type of vehicle, the greatest fuel savings often comes from improving the efficiency of the less efficient car,'' Soll said. "When fuel efficiency is expressed as gallons per 100 miles, it becomes clear which combination of cars will save a family the most gas."
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
contributors
Recent Blog Posts
Related Blogs
- Alternative Energy Blog
- AutoBlog Green
- BusinessGreen
- Carbon Trading
- CNET Greentech Blog
- Conscious Consuming
- Consumer Reports: Greener Choices
- Green Business
- Green Trust Sustainability
- Groovy Green
- How to Go Green
- IHT's Business of Green
- Inside Green Business
- Joel Makower
- The 30-day No Trash Challenge
- World Changing
Organizations
- The Appalachian Mountain Club
- Ceres
- Conservation International
- Conservation Law Foundation
- Earthwatch Institute
- Environmental Defense
- European and Chicago Climate Exchanges
- Friends of the Earth
- Greenpeace
- International Energy Agency
- Mass Audubon
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- The Nature Conservancy
- The Pew Center on Global Climate Change
- The Sierra Club
- United Nations Environment Agency
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
- US Department of Energy
- World Meteorlogical Association
- WWF
Information Sources
- About My Planet
- Alternative Energy Investments
- Alternative Energy News
- CleanTech
- Climate Ark
- Climate Biz
- Climate Change News Digest
- Environmental News Network
- Green Business News
- WGBH's The Greens
- GreenBiz.com
- Greenwire
- Live Science
- National Geographic Environment
- PESWiki
- Point Carbon
- Renewable Energy Access
- Sprig







Simple really. In Australia, we have been expressing fuel efficiency in litres per 100 Kilometres, which is definately a better way for the average joe to understand. It also helps drivers figure out just how much fuel remains in their tank when the warning light comes on!