< Back to Front Page Text size +

An energy solution? One community may dim streetlights

Posted by David Beard, Boston.com Staff July 6, 2008 10:59 PM

By Marc Larocque, Globe Correspondent

Look at the bright side. (Or is that the dark side?) It could soon be easier to see the stars at night in the small community of Franklin, N.H.

Officials in the town of about 8,700 will vote Monday whether to try to save money by turning off about 40 percent of the community's streetlights.

A plan drafted by the local fire chief recommends removing 215 of Franklin’s 513 street lights. Proponents say it would save the town $23,000 a year.

City Councilor Ted Starkweather said the lights would not be turned off in retail or business centers, routes students walk on, areas with crosswalks or sidewalks, and areas with high accident or crime rates. He also said the electric company, Public Service of New Hampshire, would accommodate requests of residents to keep street lights, which cost about $115 a year, if they opt to pay for them.

Mayor Ken Merrifield said he is pondering whether to veto the measure, if it's passed Monday by the city council. He noted that it will cost money initially to douse the lights.

“I would not veto haphazardly,” he said. “But in all truth … we are going to save 1/10 of 1 percent of our budget – for next year. We save zero this year because of cost associated with removal. It will actually cost us more to turn them off then to keep them on.”

Councilor Jay Bowers said the proposal could have other benefits besides saving the town thousands of dollars.

“I’m lucky that I live on a street where there aren’t many lights,” Bowers said. “A lot of people are concerned about light pollution. It may be a great benefit that you’d be able to see the stars.”

Readers, does this sound like one good solution to lowering a community's energy costs? Have your say in the comments section at this bottom of this article.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
2 comments so far...
  1. Yes! If it saves money (electricity bills), then why not? Of course, where safety is an issue, that comes first over switching off lights. Check out the dark skies initiative and call your state Rep. It will also make the night sky more visible and it doesn't hurt to look up at the sky and admire the beautiful stars and constellations and the moon. When was the last time you looked up at the night sky?

    Posted by Amit July 7, 08 02:20 PM
  1. I think this is a wonderful idea. Turning off streetlights is likely not an option for many towns, but the sodium halide lights used for streetlights are energy hogs. Could these be replaced with another type of lamp, or could the power to them be reduced proportionally in order to dim the lights? This would combat light pollution *and* save electricity.

    Posted by Kaydee July 7, 08 04:54 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About the green blog Helping Boston live a greener, more environmentally friendly life.

contributors

Bennie DiNardo is the Boston Globe's deputy managing editor/multimedia
Beth Daley covers environmental issues for the Globe
Christine Chinlund is deputy health/science editor for the Globe.
David Beard is editor of Boston.com
Eric Bauer is site architect of Boston.com
Gideon Gil is the Globe's Health/Science editor
Glenn Yoder produces Boston.com's Lifestyle pages
Ron Agrella is Boston.com's features editor
Erin Ailworth covers energy and the business of the environment for the Globe.
Michael Prager is a Boston-area writer and blogger with a focus on green issues.
Bina Venkataraman covers environmental issues for the Globe.
Christopher Reidy covers business for the Globe.
archives

browse this blog

by category
  • Alternative Energy/Transportation
  • Environment and Health
  • Flora and Fauna
  • Greener Homes
  • Living Green
  • Wild Weather
;