An energy solution? One community may dim streetlights
By Marc Larocque, Globe Correspondent
Look at the bright side. (Or is that the dark side?) It could soon be easier to see the stars at night in the small community of Franklin, N.H.
Officials in the town of about 8,700 will vote Monday whether to try to save money by turning off about 40 percent of the community's streetlights.
A plan drafted by the local fire chief recommends removing 215 of Franklin’s 513 street lights. Proponents say it would save the town $23,000 a year.
City Councilor Ted Starkweather said the lights would not be turned off in retail or business centers, routes students walk on, areas with crosswalks or sidewalks, and areas with high accident or crime rates. He also said the electric company, Public Service of New Hampshire, would accommodate requests of residents to keep street lights, which cost about $115 a year, if they opt to pay for them.
Mayor Ken Merrifield said he is pondering whether to veto the measure, if it's passed Monday by the city council. He noted that it will cost money initially to douse the lights.
“I would not veto haphazardly,” he said. “But in all truth … we are going to save 1/10 of 1 percent of our budget – for next year. We save zero this year because of cost associated with removal. It will actually cost us more to turn them off then to keep them on.”
Councilor Jay Bowers said the proposal could have other benefits besides saving the town thousands of dollars.
“I’m lucky that I live on a street where there aren’t many lights,” Bowers said. “A lot of people are concerned about light pollution. It may be a great benefit that you’d be able to see the stars.”
Readers, does this sound like one good solution to lowering a community's energy costs? Have your say in the comments section at this bottom of this article.
contributors
Recent Blog Posts
Related Blogs
- Alternative Energy Blog
- AutoBlog Green
- BusinessGreen
- Carbon Trading
- CNET Greentech Blog
- Conscious Consuming
- Consumer Reports: Greener Choices
- Green Business
- Green Trust Sustainability
- Groovy Green
- How to Go Green
- IHT's Business of Green
- Inside Green Business
- Joel Makower
- The 30-day No Trash Challenge
- World Changing
Organizations
- Ceres
- Conservation International
- Conservation Law Foundation
- Earthwatch Institute
- Environmental Defense
- European and Chicago Climate Exchanges
- Friends of the Earth
- Greenpeace
- International Energy Agency
- Mass Audubon
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- The Nature Conservancy
- The Pew Center on Global Climate Change
- The Sierra Club
- United Nations Environment Agency
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
- US Department of Energy
- World Meteorlogical Association
- WWF
Information Sources
- About My Planet
- Alternative Energy Investments
- Alternative Energy News
- CleanTech
- Climate Ark
- Climate Biz
- Climate Change News Digest
- Environmental News Network
- Green Business News
- WGBH's The Greens
- GreenBiz.com
- Greenwire
- Live Science
- National Geographic Environment
- PESWiki
- Point Carbon
- Renewable Energy Access
- Sprig






Yes! If it saves money (electricity bills), then why not? Of course, where safety is an issue, that comes first over switching off lights. Check out the dark skies initiative and call your state Rep. It will also make the night sky more visible and it doesn't hurt to look up at the sky and admire the beautiful stars and constellations and the moon. When was the last time you looked up at the night sky?
I think this is a wonderful idea. Turning off streetlights is likely not an option for many towns, but the sodium halide lights used for streetlights are energy hogs. Could these be replaced with another type of lamp, or could the power to them be reduced proportionally in order to dim the lights? This would combat light pollution *and* save electricity.
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.