< Back to Front Page Text size +

Patrick signs landmark energy legislation

Posted by bdaley July 2, 2008 07:24 PM

By Beth Daley, GLobe Staff

Governor Deval Patrick today signed a landmark energy bill that does away with long-standing obstacles to building renewable power projects in Massachusetts and making homes and businesses more energy efficient.

The wide-ranging Green Communities Act was hailed by environmentalists as among the most innovative efforts in the nation to lessen dependence on fossil fuels and encourage the use of clean technologies that don't contribute to global warming.

The law will likely result in utilities designing customized plans for homeowners and businesses to lower energy costs and providing rebates to pay for measures such as installing insulating windows and more efficient boilers. Homeowners and businesses will be able to rent solar panels from utilities to avoid expensive up-front costs, and the law makes it easier for homeowners who have installed wind turbines or solar panels to sell any surplus energy.

Supporters said the new law could save hundreds of millions of dollars through energy efficiency, helping to hold down consumers' electric bills at a time when energy prices are skyrocketing.

"I am here today to sign into law the best clean energy bill in America," said a jubilant Patrick during a signing ceremony at the Museum of Science. "Climate change is the challenge of our times and we in Massachusetts are rising to that challenge."

Massachusetts has long been a leader in energy legislation -- it is taking part in a regional effort to reduce greenhouse gases from power plants -- and Patrick has set an aggressive goal to increase solar power in the state by 600 percent in four years.

The law "maintains Massachusetts' status as a state leader," said Patrick Hogan of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, a Virginia-based environmental policy think tank.

Business leaders praised the legislation, saying it could stabilize electric rates in New England, already among the highest in the nation. Utilities, including NStar and National Grid, said they have long focused on energy efficiency but are eager to ramp up the effort as well as provide solar power to customers.

"It pushes us to a new level,'' said Tom May, NStar's chief executive. "We get to cross the street to our customer side and help them with energy choices ... such as windmills in a neighborhood or solar panels. It's helping them reduce their carbon footprint."

Among the law's major provisions:

-- A requirement for utilities to invest in energy efficiency when it's cheaper to do so than buying power. Historically, companies would simply buy more power when demand went up, which over time would result in the construction of very costly and polluting power plants. Now, utilities will have to invest in energy efficiency if to do so is equal to or cheaper than buying power. The law will also use at least 80 percent of the revenue from the regional effort to cap power plant emissions for efficiency programs, such as home energy audits to identify how to save on energy bills.

"The cleanest power plant is the one that never gets built,'" said Sam Krasnow, attorney for Environment Northeast, a research and advocacy group. "Energy efficiency is the cheapest and cleanest energy resource available."

-- Several efforts to promote renewable power. Utilities would have to enter into 10- or 15-year contracts with renewable energy developers, an effort to help those developers get financing from banks. The Patrick administration is particularly proud of a provision that lifts a prohibition on utilities owning solar electric panels and allows them to rent the panels to customers. The law is designed to allow utilities to recoup the cost of panels over time from rental fees while the customers reap energy savings.

Utilities will have to purchase a greater amount of their electricity from renewable power sources than under current law. By 2030, utilities would be buying 25 percent of their power from renewables. It's unclear whether that goal, one of the most ambitious in the nation, can be met, however. The current requirement of 3.5 percent has not been met, partly because of the difficulty in siting renewable projects, and utilities instead pay a fee to the state.

-- The creation of "Green Communities." The state will commit $10 million annually to helping communities figure out ways to become more energy efficient or invest in renewables, including giving them no-interest loans. New buildings in the state will have to meet updated building codes with energy-savings provisions.

The energy bill encountered some controversy during the two years it took to become law. Early versions guaranteed a market for coal gasification, a technology that is cleaner than conventional coal burning power plants but still emits large amounts of carbon dioxide. The final language would give financial incentives to gasification technologies only in limited cirumstances, and only if they capture and store the carbon dioxide underground.

Environmentalists had nothing buy praise for the law today, saying it was a paradigm shift in the way energy will be created, bought and sold.

"This is a tremendous advancement that comes not a moment too soon, given rising energy prices and the climate crisis," said Conservation Law Foundation staff attorney Sue Reid.

"This legislation will help businesses and residential consumers fight rising energy costs, reap the benefits of renewable energy and grow our clean energy industry," said Ian Bowles, state secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs.
Beth Daley can be reached at bdaley@globe.com.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
8 comments so far...
  1. ...but will Cape Wind be able to construct windmillsseveral miles off the coast of Nantucket, or not cause it might obstruct John Kerry's view?

    Posted by Jack July 2, 08 08:00 PM
  1. "Utilities will have to purchase a greater amount of their electricity from renewable power sources than under current law. By 2030, utilities would be buying 25 percent of their power from renewables. It's unclear whether that goal, one of the most ambitious in the nation, can be met, however. The current requirement of 3.5 percent has not been met, partly because of the difficulty in siting renewable projects, and utilities instead pay a fee to the state. "

    First off, I don't want to wait till 2030 for 25 %, what does "It's unclear whether that goal, one of the most ambitious in the nation, can be met" mean? Why don’t they release the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, isnt that what it is for?

    Posted by JOHN MILLS July 2, 08 08:41 PM
  1. This is a great step forward! Another idea that would REALLY shake things up and bring about actual changes in consumption? Switch to pre-paying for gas and electricity the way you do when you fill up your car. If you had to swipe your debit card at the meter, or send in a check BEFORE you used the resource, you can bet you would think about what you could do to reduce your consumption. And switching out everyone's meters for a pre-pay meter would be a LOT cheaper and more do-able than all of the incremental energy-efficiency renovations and renewable energy installations (which are designed to make unchanged consumption habits a little more efficient, but which may founder if poorly used, maintained or installed in the first place.)
    -just thinkin'

    Posted by James Carr, AIA July 2, 08 09:45 PM
  1. It's not Kerry, but those better than the rest of us Kennedys that don't want Cape Wind to be built. They are all for a cleaner environment, just not in their backyard.

    Posted by Steve July 2, 08 09:55 PM
  1. Not Kerry, Kennedy. It's Kennedy who's against Cape Wind.

    John Kerry, it should be noted, had the courage to take no position on the proposal. Boo-yah!

    Also, the project won a big victory in court this week. It's going forward.

    Posted by joe July 2, 08 10:34 PM
  1. I have one word for you and that is Nuclear. Solar while nice just doesn't produce that much energy so the Gov. once again is just acting without thinking. 10 mil a year could be better spent. For all those environmentalist out there you might want to take a look at China where 1/4 of the worlds population is just coming online.

    Posted by Tom July 2, 08 10:52 PM
  1. SAVE THE PLANET! NUCLEAR POWER NOW!

    Posted by Pat July 3, 08 12:01 AM
  1. James Carr has an interesting idea about pre-paying for energy. Actually this was the norm in British rooming houses until fairly recently. Putting a shilling in the meter to get one bar of a radiant heater to warm the chill of a squalid bed-sit was the experience of many a punter - enhanced only by wiping one's finger across the weeping walls of condensation.
    A better idea, now being tried in the UK, is the energy monitor, a dashboard readout working in real time that informs you of your energy consumption as you use hot water, your iron, your home entertainment center etc. Somewhat analogous to the Prius dashboard.
    The nice thing about this is that it gives the consumer information on which she can do some cost/benefit decisionmaking.

    Posted by Hubert Murray July 16, 08 02:32 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About the green blog Helping Boston live a greener, more environmentally friendly life.

contributors

Bennie DiNardo is the Boston Globe's deputy managing editor/multimedia
Beth Daley covers environmental issues for the Globe
Christine Chinlund is deputy health/science editor for the Globe.
David Beard is editor of Boston.com
Eric Bauer is site architect of Boston.com
Gideon Gil is the Globe's Health/Science editor
Glenn Yoder produces Boston.com's Lifestyle pages
Ron Agrella is Boston.com's features editor
Erin Ailworth covers energy and the business of the environment for the Globe.
Michael Prager is a Boston-area writer and blogger with a focus on green issues.
Bina Venkataraman covers environmental issues for the Globe.
Christopher Reidy covers business for the Globe.
archives

browse this blog

by category
  • Alternative Energy/Transportation
  • Environment and Health
  • Flora and Fauna
  • Greener Homes
  • Living Green
  • Wild Weather
;