EPA: Say goodbye to super-smoggy gas lawn mowers
Under new EPA rules, gas-powered lawn mowers are going to spew 35 percent less in emissions by 2011, a reduction in pollution that environmentalists say is equal to removing one of every five cars and trucks from the road.
The new standards, issued Thursday after years of battling with industry lobbyists, would kick in in 2010 for speedboats and other recreational watercraft.
According to this report from the AP, the EPA said approximately 190 million gallons of gasoline will be saved each year when the rules take effect, and more than 300 premature deaths prevented annually.
The EPA's cost estimate: $236 million annually. According to the AP, tthe California Air Resources Board has estimated that walk-behind mowers would cost 18 percent more under the new regulation.
Environmentalists welcomed the regulation, which applies to lawn care engines under 25 horsepower and to a full range of gas-powered personal watercraft. The rule requires a 70 percent reduction in emissions from recreational watercraft.
"These small engines are big polluters," said Vickie Patton, deputy counsel of the Enviromental Defense Fund. "Finalizing protective clean air standards for these engines is an important step toward healthy air for the millions of Americans living in neighborhoods and communities with unhealthy ozone pollution levels."
For more from the Environmental Defense Fund on this issue, click here.
What do you think about the new rule? Let us know in our comments section.
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
contributors
Recent Blog Posts
Related Blogs
- Alternative Energy Blog
- AutoBlog Green
- BusinessGreen
- Carbon Trading
- CNET Greentech Blog
- Conscious Consuming
- Consumer Reports: Greener Choices
- Green Business
- Green Trust Sustainability
- Groovy Green
- How to Go Green
- IHT's Business of Green
- Inside Green Business
- Joel Makower
- The 30-day No Trash Challenge
- World Changing
Organizations
- The Appalachian Mountain Club
- Ceres
- Conservation International
- Conservation Law Foundation
- Earthwatch Institute
- Environmental Defense
- European and Chicago Climate Exchanges
- Friends of the Earth
- Greenpeace
- International Energy Agency
- Mass Audubon
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- The Nature Conservancy
- The Pew Center on Global Climate Change
- The Sierra Club
- United Nations Environment Agency
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
- US Department of Energy
- World Meteorlogical Association
- WWF
Information Sources
- About My Planet
- Alternative Energy Investments
- Alternative Energy News
- CleanTech
- Climate Ark
- Climate Biz
- Climate Change News Digest
- Environmental News Network
- Green Business News
- WGBH's The Greens
- GreenBiz.com
- Greenwire
- Live Science
- National Geographic Environment
- PESWiki
- Point Carbon
- Renewable Energy Access
- Sprig







This is an example of what it means to have
a lot of experience and terrible judgment.
What in the world was McCain thinking
about when he chose Palin? Daaaaa
I can just imagine what Palin would say
at an emergency World Summit when
she is asked what she would recommend
be done with Red China?
Her answer would be, put it on
a *Purple Table Cloth*
With all the brilliant women in the
United States to pick from this was
a really stupid choice.
This proves that McCain is in la-la
land.
Just what we do not need is another
President like Bush, or worse.
McCain just gave the election to
Obama!!
Thank God.