< Back to Front Page Text size +

Troubled species 2, Sarah Palin 0

Posted by David Beard, Boston.com Staff October 18, 2008 04:43 PM

palinsketch4.jpg

What's next for Sarah Palin? Skunks?

Alaska's governor and John McCain's high-flying running-mate, who lost in her attempt to stop the US government from declaring polar bears a threatened species, went 0-for-2 on Friday. That's when Washington decided to put the beluga whales of Alaska's Cook Inlet, which haven't recovered since their numbers were cut in half during the 1990s, on the endangered species list.

Why a whale derider? Palin on Friday called the decision ''premature'' and challenged government data on declining populations, as she has done regarding polar bears. Here's more from The New York Times:

As with the polar bear, Ms. Palin’s administration opposed the beluga listing in part because of its potential to restrict coastal and offshore oil and gas development. The beluga listing could also affect other projects, including the expansion of the Port of Anchorage and a proposed bridge over Knik Arm that would connect Anchorage to the Matanuska-Susitna Valley and Ms. Palin’s hometown, Wasilla.
“I am especially concerned,” the governor said in a written statement in August 2007, when her administration submitted documents to fight the listing, “that an unnecessary federal listing and designation of critical habitat would do serious long-term damage to the vibrant economy of the Cook Inlet area.”

It should be noted that Alaskan opposition to Friday's ruling extends to the other side of the political aisle, with Anchorage Mayor and Democratic Senate aspirant Mark Begich saying the decision could hurt a $500 million project to expand Anchorage's port.

To see a photogaph of a 6-year-old pearl-white beluga whale
click here to this account from today's Globe
.

Also, here's an account from earlier this month of the declining population of the whales, and here's a commentary from Pacific Free Press that calls Palin's beluga-bashing a coddling of Big Oil consistent with her ''paleo-conservative'' views.

Readers, what's your thought on this? Do you think beluga whales will come up in a skit in tonight's Sarah Palin-guest-star version of NBC's "Saturday Night Live"? Do you think the US government rushed to judgment here? Let us know in our comments section. A footnote: the cartoon at top is a caricature by Globe cartoonist Dan Wasserman.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
20 comments so far...
  1. Its obvious as to what kind of person this Palin is, knowing that why does anyone support her?

    Posted by Srethng October 18, 08 05:43 PM
  1. Thank goodness for the five environmental groups that kept at this to see the Cook's Inlet baluga whale (a genetically different variety from the other four Alaska populations), including the three specifically from Alaska.

    In mulling over several articles for my blog post, it became evident that the Cook Inlet has serious environmental problems, among them barely treated muni waste going into the inlet, upstream pollution which enters the Cook Inlet from oil/gas exploration, oil drilling in/around the Inlet, and ships in the inlet along with gill net fishing. WHAT did they expect?.

    G.

    Posted by cany October 18, 08 06:18 PM
  1. I think it's outrageous to suggest that a corporation be prevented from seeking maximum profit, or a locale prevented from seeking maximum growth when the only cost is the extinction of a species or two. Next you'll be suggesting that the corporations reduce their profits by stopping their polluting of the air we breathe and the water we drink!

    You people are unbelieveable!

    Posted by phonyuser October 18, 08 07:20 PM
  1. The Green Liberal Agenda blinds their ability to reason. Their obscure purpouse makes them forge their own destruction.

    Posted by Chispita October 18, 08 07:55 PM
  1. Sarah Palin has a deep dark hole where her soul should be. To suggest that Sarah Palin should be in any leadership role whatsoever is akin to suggesting that Ronald McDonald should be the head of the FDA. Her special interests are spelled out in bold, highly legible 72 point Times New Roman across her forehead. The appalling nature of her statements is surpassed only by the fact she is being taken seriously.

    Posted by Mike October 18, 08 08:31 PM
  1. Yes things are so bad that the beluga population in Cook Inlet rose by 10% again last year and now stands at equal the number of 1998, up almost double from the low.

    Posted by JimAK October 18, 08 08:39 PM
  1. The Palin nomination is an insult to women, as it is to the Republican party. By nominating her, John McCain has proven that he only cares about winning, even if it places our Country in harms way (do you honestly believe she was the most qualified person available?) If this creationist beauty queen becomes President may God (whatever your beliefs) help us all. Please get over your prejudice and do the right thing. This joke isn't funny any more, and the oval office is not the place to test out America's next comedy/reality series.

    Posted by worried American October 18, 08 09:04 PM
  1. Polar Bear populations have soared over the past twenty years. Suggesting they are in serious threat of extinction is simply not in-line with facts. Resist the urge to engage in this ridiculous, agenda driven, hysteria

    Posted by Jack October 18, 08 10:42 PM
  1. These beluga whales are a genetically unique species of Beluga Whale. They should be protected. One of the reasons they're not gaining in population is that Palin allowed Chevron to dump excess pollution into Cook Inlet where these whales live, just as the city of Anchorage dumps barely treated waste there. Manmade pollution has a lot to do with their population not thriving. Palin's love of oil and gas exploration would be the final nail in their coffin.
    phonyuser: To think a corporation has the right to do what it wants and kill off a species or two is not only barbaric, it is inhuman and inhumane. as well as ignorant. We don't have the right to carry on in such a way. Don't you realize that what those companies are doing is dangerous to the human population as well? If every single corporation took the viewpoint you suggested, we'd have no species left . There'd be no lions, tigers, pandas. grizzlies, bald eagles, salmon (which have also been on this governor's hit list with her blind love of mines, despite the fact that salmon fishing is a renewable and profitable resource and minig is a finite and polluting one), cougars, alligators, or any number of species that have been brought from the brink of extinction because there are laws that protect species from corporate greed. She still has no qualms about causing the extinction of polar bears. Corporations should be able to work without needlessly causing the extinction of an entire species. Only an ignorant savage would feel differently which is why there are no woolly mammoths or dodo birds left today. Fortunately, MOST of us have evolved beyond our primitive ancestors. Unfortunately, there remain a few people who have not.

    .

    Posted by maxiemom October 19, 08 12:16 AM
  1. Awwww, poor polar bears...with all of the issues facing PEOPLE, it's soooo important to worry about a species that is obsolete. Face it, extinction happens to animals that do not evolve, that is a fact of nature. Elephants, polar bears, lions and whales WILL die out, it is just a matter of time. They are the dinosaurs of this millenium. The Globes hatred of Palin and Repubs in general notwithstanding, nature will take her course. Humans need to worry about preserving our own species.

    Posted by fourthpig October 19, 08 07:03 AM
  1. Add to this, her support of the aerial slaughter of wolves in Alaska and the subsequent shooting of the motherless pups and you've got to wonder about this homo sapien. God forbid any species stands in the way of "progress" if she's elected.

    Posted by Sacoggb October 19, 08 07:25 AM
  1. idiot liberals: 10
    logical environmental policies: 0

    Posted by jk October 19, 08 08:18 AM
  1. Palin should be asking, what would Jesus do, since she is so religious. Not to consider one of Gods creations, the Beluga, goes against her core religious principles. Who is the real Sarah Palin?

    Posted by joe October 19, 08 11:00 AM
  1. There's no doubt that balance must be maintained between economic development and environmental protection. It is the nature of politics in a democratic society that issues like this typically achieve compromise from positions argued at the extremes (by "extremes" I don't mean language like "idiot liberals" which hardly qualifies as argument; perhaps it qualifies as "idiocy.") In recent years, we have embraced the fiction that there is no place for law and regulation to protect the environment, or worker safety, or financial transaction, or health care, or education, and on, and on.

    Clearly, there is an important role for public oversight and regulation. Although this role should not get out-of-hand, to allow untrammeled, unchecked private sector reign gets us -- well -- where we are today. There ARE public interests, and we elect governments to see that they are respected and protected from the rapaciousness of those heedlessly self-serving elements of the rich and powerful at the expense of the rest of us in "pro-American" areas of the Country, which is to say all of it, yes, even Massachusetts.

    Posted by j0646 October 19, 08 11:09 AM
  1. The worst VP pick ever. She will be the reason John McCain loses.

    Posted by whynot October 19, 08 11:24 AM
  1. One has to wonder about palin's alleged Christian values. Why does she pursue economic/corporate interests at the expense of humane interests? Render onto Ceaser Gov. Where in her Christian values (forgiveness, love, acceptance, etc...) do you see justification for vendettas such as the one you engage in with your former brother-in-law?

    Posted by baffled by Church lady October 19, 08 03:34 PM
  1. It is now time to question Sen. McCain's judgment; that is his judgment in regards to selecting Sarah Palin as his running mate. We the people of the U. S. have the
    right to demand that McCain lay bare before us Palin's qualifications to possibly
    assume the high office of the U. S.
    We want to know not only her educational background in national and inter-
    national law, but her previous governing record; that is her social interaction and
    acceptance by the people of Wasilla and the whole state of Alaska. What is her
    record in regard to handling monetary and legal matters? What has she accom-
    plished to further the advancement of living conditions in that part of our country?
    Is there compassion in her handling the problems of the common ordinary people? WE NEED TO HEAR THE VOICES OF THESE PEOPLE.

    Posted by Mary M. October 19, 08 04:00 PM
  1. This sort of pandering to extremist environmentalists is one of the reasons most of the people in the West hate Washington DC: listing animals as endangered based on phony science. It's no wonder there are groups that want to secede from the US.

    Posted by kws October 20, 08 02:47 AM
  1. The Palins are one step away from being felons troopergate, tax evasion, shooting wovles illegally, lawsuits against her for using her Yahoo account for Gov Business, refusing to release her medical records like all the other candidates and lord knows what else.

    The worst VP Pick ever. This is how John McCain will be remembered.

    Posted by whynot October 20, 08 02:57 PM
  1. If you look at Sarah Palin's horrible treatment of wildlife and the environment , her obvious stupidity, her nutty archaic beliefs and her role in Troopergate, she comes across as the most cruel, selfish, stupid and corrupt U.S. V.P. candidate ever!
    Luckily, she's going back to Alaska in 2 weeks:)

    Posted by scout October 20, 08 11:00 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About the green blog Helping Boston live a greener, more environmentally friendly life.

contributors

Bennie DiNardo is the Boston Globe's deputy managing editor/multimedia
Beth Daley covers environmental issues for the Globe
Christine Chinlund is deputy health/science editor for the Globe.
David Beard is editor of Boston.com
Eric Bauer is site architect of Boston.com
Gideon Gil is the Globe's Health/Science editor
Glenn Yoder produces Boston.com's Lifestyle pages
Ron Agrella is Boston.com's features editor
Erin Ailworth covers energy and the business of the environment for the Globe.
Michael Prager is a Boston-area writer and blogger with a focus on green issues.
Bina Venkataraman covers environmental issues for the Globe.
Christopher Reidy covers business for the Globe.
archives

browse this blog

by category
  • Alternative Energy/Transportation
  • Environment and Health
  • Flora and Fauna
  • Greener Homes
  • Living Green
  • Wild Weather
;