Controversial chemical in bodies directly linked to drinking from BPA bottles
By Beth Daley, Globe Staff
UPDATE: A few readers asked the good question how can they know which bottles contain BPA. The chemical is found in polycarbonate plastic bottles often marked on the bottom with the recycling number 7. Not all number 7 labeled products contain BPA, but this is a good rule of thumb to follow.
A Harvard study released today confirms what many public health experts have long assumed: Hard plastic drinking bottles containing bisphenol A are leaching notable amounts of the controversial chemical into people's bodies.
Researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health found that people who drank for a week from the popular, clear plastic bottles increased concentrations of bisphenol A -- or BPA -- in their urine by 69 percent
The study -- the first to definitively show that drinking from BPA bottles increases the levels of the chemical in urine -- was published on the website of the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.
Bisphenol A is used in hundreds of everyday products - making reusable, hard plastic bottles more durable and helping prevent corrosion in canned goods such as soup and infant formula.
“If you heat those bottles, as is the case with baby bottles, we would expect the levels to be considerably higher,’’ said Karin B. Michels, senior author of the report and associate professor at the School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School. “This would be of concern since infants may be particularly susceptible to BPA’s endocrine-disrupting potential,’’ she said.
Numerous animal studies in recent years suggest that low levels of bisphenol A might cause developmental problems in fetuses and young children, as well as other ill effects. The health impacts for adults are not well understood although a recent large human study linked BPA concentrations in people's urine to an increased prevalence of diabetes, heart disease, and liver toxicity.
Canada banned the use of BPA in baby bottles in 2008 and Massachusetts health officials are now weighing whether to warn pregnant women and young children to avoid food, drinks, and other items containing the chemical.
The US Food and Drug Administration has said that products containing BPA are safe and that exposure levels, including those for infants and children, are below those that would affect health. But the FDA's own scientific advisory board criticized agency officials for relying on industry-funded studies to declare the chemical safe. Michael L. Herndon, an FDA spokesman, said in e-mail to the Globe yesterday that newly appointed chief scientist, Jesse Goodman, will "provide new leadership and take a fresh look at this important issue from a scientific and policy position, incorporating emerging science and appropriate input from both inside and outside the agency.”
The Harvard study was sparked by a discussion in Michel’s class after she warned students who regularly swigged water from hard plastic bottles they might want to limit their BPA exposure. The students countered by asking how much BPA they were getting from the bottles – and soon, a study was born.
Led by Harvard School of Public Health doctoral student Jenny L. Carwile, 77 Harvard students in the study drank all cold beverages from stainless steel bottles for a week to wash BPA out of their bodies and minimize exposure. Most BPA is flushed from people’s bodies within a matter of hours. During that week, the students gave urine samples.
Then the students were given two refillable polycarbonate bottles made with BPA to drink all cold beverages from for another week. Urine samples taken over that week showed that the students' BPA levels spiked the second week to levels normally found in the general population. Because the students did nothing different in their schedules other than drink from the BPA bottles, the researchers determined their urine concentrations largely came from the bottles.
“While previous students have demonstrated that BPA is linked to adverse health effects, this study fills in a missing piece of the puzzle – whether or not polycarbonate plastic bottles are an important contributor to the amount of BPA in the body,’’ said Carwile.
The American Chemistry Council offers the following comments in response to queries regarding the study led by Karin B. Michels, a Harvard professor of epidemiology, and published May 12, 2009, in the online version of the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.
In an e-mail, Steven G. Hentges of the American Chemistry Council said the study shows that exposure to bisphenol A from use of the bottles is "extremely low" and below the mean BPA amounts reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the US population, "indicating that even exclusive use of polycarbonate bottles does not lead to unusually high levels of bisphenol A in the urine.



Gee would expect the chemical industry to say anything else???
We need to follow Canada's lead and ban this substance all together. there is no way to tell every product that is packaged with this chemical. A total ban is the only way to protect the public!!
It's interesting and sounds like we do need more info. Modern techniques can detect extremely small amounts of substances, such that if you analyse the dirt in your basement you could detect traces of uranium, cyanide and other nasty things. It seems clear that
i) you can absorb measurable amounts of Bisphenol-A by drinking cold beverages from some types of bottles - apparrantly the more durable, useful types unfortunately and
ii) the result is noteably more than the amount you would have in your system from whatever background exposure most people have
This is not something to panic about. We may need to get rid of bis-a in places where we wind up eating some of it, but by rushing to substitute something else we may simply trade hazards.
You get zero crud from eating fresh fruits, vegtables, nuts and seeds.
I always did like old-fashioned stuff to cook with, mostly b/c like old stuff. Sounds like glass bottles and jars are as good as ever. But they're not much use in a backpack.
hm. the 'healthy' pomegranite juice in my fridge was in that plastic, but all the Scotch is in glass .... maybe they know something.
After taking a swig of anything out a plastic bottle just don't stand in front of a microwave, fired up stove, or for that matter out in 90+ degree sun.
When we're 50 and have cancer, we'll all wonder why.
time to go back to the old metal canteen, or the modern equivalent of same.
I'm a chemist, and I can tell you that lying and deception prevails in the entire industry, from pharmaceuticals to pesticides. There is a lot of money and profits at stake here, organizations like the FDA are obviously in the back pockets of corporations.
For us non-rocket scientists, could the Globe or someone tell us what bottles have this crap in them? DO they correspond to the recycle numbers 1-7? Are they in milk containers? More clear info is needed to educated the unwashed masses.
Funny how the country where the government pays everyone's health care costs has already banned this, while we haven't...wait, actually, that's not really funny at all, is it...
and we can find out if we have any of these "hard" plastic bottles how? I think I have soft, hard and really hard plastic bottles and containers. and what about plastic storage bags? and is it just in plastic? what about glass and ceramics. someone please tell me what's what??!
All too often the phrase "industry funded studies" is connected to minimizing or approving of substances and practices that ought to be discontinued.
Independent research is critical. The issue of reliability of studies, and the nature of funding of these studies is a much greater concern. Skewing data, marketing, and advertising are not part of ethical, responsible research.
For years, the EPA and FDA have been run by individuals from the very industries the agencies are charged to oversee. The issue of oversight by industry loyalists runs right through all major industries and is, to a great extent, the cause of fraud, waste, health risks and corruption. It is hoped that American citizens increasingly speak up, take action, pay much closer attention.
I've been reusing gatoraide bottles for years. Do they have BPA? They don't have any number on the bottom.
To homer and ally33:
This is an ongoing issue, and the writer's assumed readers to have some prior knowledge about it. In short, the most commonly used plastics with BPA are Nalgene-type water bottles. However, there's not really a quick and easy way to identify which other products contain it. I suggest digging around on the web...start with google and wikipedia?
Im in 5th grade names lexi k if it so bad kids in my class drink 1to 3 bottles of water that are hard plastic and now im worried
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
contributors
Recent Blog Posts
browse this blog
by categoryRelated Blogs
Organizations
Information Sources
INside Boston.com