Too much mercury in some students' school lunches
Students may be taking in unsafe levels of mercury with their tuna fish sandwiches at the school lunch table, new research shows.
The report, called “Tuna Surprise” advises school officials and parents not to serve any albacore tuna to children and to limit consumption of light tuna to twice a month for most kids and only once a month for children under 55 pounds. Researchers, commissioned by the Vermont-based Mercury Policy Project which works to lower mercury levels in the environment, found triple the amount of mercury in albacore compared to light tuna. The study is believed to be the first of its kind to examine mercury in school lunches.
Mercury is a neurotoxin that can damage the developing brain of children and fetuses. Power plants and incinerators emit the metal into the air, and the pollutant can travel thousands of miles before falling and washing into waterways. Fish then accumulate the mercury over time and humans can be poisoned from eating too much fish. In Massachusetts and many neighboring states, pregnant woman and children are urged not to eat fish from any lake or pond because of the mercury danger.
“It’s unfortunate that this otherwise healthy food is contaminated with toxic mercury and that parents and schools need to keep it from appearing too frequently on the menu,” said Elizabeth Saunders, Massachusetts Legislative Director for Clean Water Action, which co-released the report. She said there was good news in the study because it can be easy to reduce exposure.
MPP tested the mercury content of fifty-nine samples, representing eight brands of tuna, sold to schools in 11 states around the country, including Massachusetts. Mercury levels were consistent with levels found in tuna sold in grocery and seafood stores, but were troubling because American school children eat twice as much tuna as they do any other kind of fish – and it’s a staple in many school lunch programs.
Study sponsors were quick to point out that the research did not mean all children were at risk - but parents and schools needed to focus in on those children who "loved" tuna to limit their exposure.
“Most children are already consuming only modest amounts of tuna and are not at significant risk,” said Michael Bender, MPP’s director. “So the focus really needs to be on kids who eat tuna often, to limit their mercury exposure by offering them lower-mercury seafood or other nutritious alternatives.”
Here are some recommendations from the report:
• Children weighing more than 55 pounds should not eat more than two servings of light tuna per month. This amount of tuna (six ounces) is more than the average child currently consumes; the mercury dose it contains is acceptably low in risk.
• Children up to 55 pounds should consume no more than one tuna meal per month. Because of their smaller body size, an added margin of caution is appropriate for younger children.
• “Tuna-loving” kids should be the focus of risk-management efforts. In particular:
o No child should eat tuna every day.
o Parents and schools should offer children other seafood choices, such as shrimp and salmon, which are just as nutritious but contain far less mercury.
• The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s School Lunch Program should phase out commodity purchases of canned tuna, and replace it with lower-mercury alterative seafood items and other extra-lean protein sources.
• Parents should monitor their children’s canned tuna consumption at school and ensure that the total consumed at home and at school does not exceed the recommendations for exposure.
For more information:
http://mercuryfactsandfish.org/
http://blueocean.org/documents/2012/07/boi-mercury-report.pdf
(Photo courtesy of USDA.gov)
About the green blog |
Helping Boston live a greener, more environmentally friendly life.
|
Contributors
Related blogs
- CNET Greentech Blog
- Consumer Reports
- CNET Green Tech
- Consumer Reports: Greener Choices
- NY Times Green Blog
- Grist
- Treehugger
- World Changing
Organizations
- The Appalachian Mountain Club
- Ceres
- Conservation International
- Conservation Law Foundation
- Earthwatch Institute
- Environmental Defense
- European and Chicago Climate Exchanges
- Friends of the Earth
- Greenpeace
- International Energy Agency
- Mass Audubon
- Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- The Nature Conservancy
- The Pew Center on Global Climate Change
- The Sierra Club
- United Nations Environment Agency
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
- US Department of Energy
- World Meteorlogical Association
- WWF





