Female surgeons say explicit bias is rare, but subtler obstacles still exist in Boston

Several say they note gains

By Liz Kowalczyk
Globe Staff /  February 25, 2013
Text Size:
  • +
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

The operating room, once an exclusive club for male surgeons, is becoming more welcoming to female surgeons. But the experiences of local doctors suggest that full gender equality has not yet arrived:

 A female surgeon pointedly asks why her patient is late being wheeled into the operating room, and is accused by nurses of being too aggressive.

 Surgeons meet weekly at 7 a.m. at one hospital, just when some of their female colleagues are home getting their children dressed and fed.

 And several female neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons said women in these overwhelmingly male specialties often feel they must work longer hours and operate on more patients than their male colleagues to prove they belong.

The explicit gender discrimination alleged in a high-profile lawsuit settled for $7 million this month against Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and its former chief of surgery is rare in Boston hospitals, according to 10 female surgeons interviewed by the Globe. Still, female surgeons can experience subtler obstacles, including pressure to behave a certain way and conflicting family responsibilities.

The number of women entering general surgery has climbed steadily; they now account for more than 35 percent of trainees in the United States. But very few women have moved into leadership roles. And certain surgical specialties long known for their machismo have resisted change. About 5 percent of practicing neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons are female.

“We’ve really made strides, but we still have a lot of work to do,’’ said Dr. Susan Pories, president of the Association of Women Surgeons.

In her lawsuit, Dr. Carol Warfield, former head of anesthesiology at Beth Israel Deaconess, accused former surgery chief Dr. Josef Fischer of gender bias that included replying to her male colleagues when she spoke to him, and talking openly about his preference to hire male residents. Fischer and the hospital have denied doing anything wrong.

“There are always going to be some people who haven’t gotten the message,” Pories said, but “for the most part male colleagues are far more respectful than they were 10 to 20 years ago.’’

When she was a medical student and resident during the early 1960s, Dr. Carol Nadelson said, female trainees expected sexist comments. “You had to steel yourself for it,’’ said Nadelson, a psychiatrist who until recently was director of the Office for Women’s Careers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. “It hasn’t been at that level in a while.’’

Yet, Dr. Dana Fugelso, a surgeon who said Fischer took away her operating room time and secretary while she was out on maternity leave for 12 weeks in 2002 — and then refused to restore them when she returned — believes subtle bias continues. Fischer denied those allegations in court documents included in the Warfield case, saying his policy on operating room time applied equally to all types of leaves.

“If someone today thinks sex discrimination is a thing of the past, they are just not looking,’’ Fugelso said. “It’s more the lack of ability to get promoted into higher academic levels and higher administrative jobs.’’

Several women said they are expected to be nicer than their male colleagues. If a female surgeon demands an operation be done a certain way, she risks getting labeled as pushy and domineering, whereas male surgeons are more often credited with demanding excellence. Other women, including nurses, can be especially critical, they said.

The women were so concerned about being labeled as complainers that they did not want to be quoted by name in the newspaper.

Ellen Zucker, a Boston attorney who represents Warfield and Dr. Nina Shervin, an orthopedic surgeon with a pending gender discrimination suit against Massachusetts General Hospital, said, “In academic medicine, those with power are in an exclusive club and women often are afraid to speak out about their concerns for fear of retribution.’’

An article published in the Annals of Surgery in April 2011 found that women in medicine, and especially surgery, are paid less and promoted more slowly than their male counterparts.

Few women head major clinical departments such as surgery and medicine at Boston’s large teaching hospitals. Mass. General has the highest number of female chiefs — four out of 20. None of the hospitals has a woman in charge of the surgery department.

These leadership positions are important because “the chairs have the power to promote or not, to assign resources and positions or not, so in essence to profoundly influence careers,’’ Nadelson said. They are chosen because they lecture internationally and have “major research credentials,’’ she said. “There are fewer women in this position. They tend to hit their academic stride later because most women physicians have kids.’’Continued...