Boston.com/Health BLOG: White Coat Notes
< Back to front page Text size +

New 3-D mammogram makes screening test a little better

Posted by Deborah Kotz  February 11, 2011 05:17 PM
  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Mammograms, those imperfect screening tests for breast cancer, may become a little bit better. The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved the first mammography device that provides 3-D images of the breast for both general screening and diagnosis of breast lumps.

The agency said that in studies where radiologists were asked to review more than 300 mammography exams, they obtained a 7 percent improvement in their ability to distinguish between cancerous and non-cancerous abnormalities as compared with viewing traditional two-dimensional X-ray scans.

About 10 percent of women who get mammography screening undergo additional testing for findings that later turn out to be benign. So a 7 percent improvement would lower that rate down to 9.3 percent -- not bad but still not significantly lowering the rate of biopsies for nonmalignant lumps.

Hologic, the Bedford-based manufacturer of the 3-D technology, says the cost for the new scan and whether it's covered by insurers remains unknown at this point. The company "is working closely with a team of reimbursement professionals to achieve reimbursement ... as soon as possible," a statement from Hologic reads. "It is not possible to predict how long this will take at this point."

Radiologists can purchase the 3-D software as an add-on to Hologic's 2-D Selenia Dimension system. And it can be used along with the 2-D scan as a first-line screening test that could be particularly useful, Hologic said, "to reveal the inner architecture of the breast, free from the distortion typically caused by tissue shadowing or density."

The one major drawback beyond the added cost for the 3-D image is the increased radiation: The FDA said the combination of the 2-D and 3-D images "approximately doubled the radiation dose the patient received" and "there is uncertainty for radiation risk estimates."

That said, the FDA determined that the reduced risk of extra mammogram screenings and biopsies to investigate abnormalities that turn out to be benign outweighs the added risk of radiation from the 3-D scan.

  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

about the blog

Daily Dose gives you the latest consumer health news and advice from Boston-area experts. Deborah Kotz is a former reporter for US News and World Report. Write her at dailydose@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter at @debkotz2.

health answers

Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

Health search

Find news and information on:
Follow us on Facebook
archives
Health Events
health resources

Be Well Boston on Twitter

    waiting for twitterWaiting for twitter.com to feed in the latest...
contributors
Gideon Gil, Health and Science Editor
Elizabeth Comeau, Senior Health Producer
Liz Kowalczyk
Kay Lazar
other health blogs