Should chewing tobacco be banned from baseball?
Red Sox manager Terry Francona
It's collective bargaining time for Major League Baseball and players may be weighing in on a vital public health issue: Whether to prohibit the use of chewing tobacco at all MLB venues -- specifically in the dugout and on the field during televised games. The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids recently joined forces with nine other groups, including the American Medical Association and American Academy of Pediatrics, to ask MLB Commissioner Bud Selig to ban the practice of chewing and spitting in baseball; more than one-third of MLB players use smokeless tobacco products regularly, according to a 2005 study from the Oregon Research Institute.
"Kids idolize these players and imitate their every move," says Danny McGoldrick, vice president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. "This is one we don't want them imitating."
Nationals pitcher Stephen Strasburg told the Washington Post in January that he was struggling to quit his smokeless tobacco habit; he says he was prompted by his former San Diego State college coach Tony Gwynn's diagnosis of salivary gland cancer, which Gwynn blamed on his chewing tobacco habit.
"I was one of those kids who picked it up based on seeing ballplayers do it," Strasburg told the Post. "It's not a good thing, and I don't want to represent myself like that."
Smokeless tobacco use among high school males -- the primary users -- has risen by 36 percent from 2003 to 2009 after being on a slight decline. Just how much of that increase can be attributed to modeling MLB players remains unknown, says McGoldrick.
What's firmly established is the habit's risks: oral cancer, esophageal cancer, and pancreatic cancer, according to the National Cancer Institute, as well as heart disease and gum disease.
The Red Sox, unfortunately, have been called out for their tobacco chewing habits. A 2006 study from the Harvard School of Public Health found that Red Sox players in game 4 of the 2004 World Series were three times more likely to use the products -- as evidenced by their drooling and spitting of remains from their mouths -- than their rivals, the Cardinals.
So is the Red Sox organization now supporting a ban of the practice during games?
I didn't get an answer to that question but was informed in an e-mailed statement that the "Red Sox follow the Major League Baseball tobacco policy, which addresses the issue of chewing tobacco; the team does not have a separate policy." The statement went on to say that players get smokeless tobacco education programs and oral examinations during Spring Training.
Officially, MLB discourages the use of tobacco and it established the National Spit Tobacco Education Program in 1994 to try to curb players' use. Yet, it hasn't followed the lead of the Minor League, which banned chewing tobacco at games.
To me, the issue shouldn't be up for much debate. After all, Major League Baseball successfully barred players from smoking cigarettes while in uniform, so why not from chewing tobacco?
I'm told the only way to effect a ban would be during the round of collective bargaining that occurs every five years. The latest session is set to finish at the end of this year.
In a November letter to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Michael Weiner, president of the Major League Baseball Players Association, stopped short of saying that an actual ban was on the table but did say that "the concerns expressed by several members of the House [of Representatives] about the use of smokeless tobacco products ... will be given a full airing with the membership."
What do you think? Should MLB players be banned from chewing and spitting during games?
-
June 6, 2011
How worried should you be about German s
By Deborah Kotz, Globe Staff Bean sprouts are likely to blame for the E. coli outbreak in Germany …
More from Health News ▼June 4, 2011
MGH study shows drug reduces breast canc
By Carolyn Y. Johnson, Globe Staff A drug that blocks production of the hormone estrogen cut breast …
-
June 10, 2011
Injured in the bathroom? You're not alon
By Deborah Kotz, Globe Staff Quick quiz: What's the most dangerous spot in the house? Sure, kitche …
More from Preventive Care ▼June 9, 2011
By Elizabeth Comeau, Boston.com Staff loading video... (please wait a moment)Requires Adobe Flash …
-
May 16, 2011
Weekly health challenge: sit less, pace
By Deborah Kotz, Globe Staff No question, most of us sit way too much, and that's not good for our …
More from Fitness ▼April 26, 2011
Your advice: The key to staying in shape
By Elizabeth Comeau, Boston.com Staff Last week, I asked you how you find the time to stay …
-
June 10, 2011
Would you try cicada ice cream? Or a gra
Greene, Bill Globe Staff/The Boston Globe By Deborah Kotz, Globe Staff I was bummed to hear th …
More from Nutrition ▼June 6, 2011
Study suggests DASH diet may prevent tee
By Deborah Kotz, Globe Staff A new research finding could help parents and public health specialis …
Daily Dose gives you the latest consumer health news and advice from Boston-area experts. Deborah Kotz is a former reporter for US News and World Report. Write her at dailydose@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter at @debkotz2.
Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

Health search

- Diseases About.com disease information
- Symptom checker What your symptoms could mean
- Drugs A-Z Side effects, drug interactions, and more
- Lab Test Interpreter What your lab results mean
- Natural Medicine A-Z Safety of herbs, supplements
- Flu.gov Government flu information
- CDC.gov Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Be Well Boston on Twitter
Gideon Gil, Health and Science Editor
Elizabeth Comeau, Senior Health Producer
Liz Kowalczyk
Kay Lazar






