Boston.com / Latest News / Nation
Back home

SectionsTodaySponsored by:

News wires
Northeast
Sports
Business
Technology
Washington
Nation
World
Health


Regional news
All Northeast
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Maine
Vermont
Connecticut
New York

SEARCH:
Keyword
This site/Globe
The Web with:

In surprising move, court orders restudy of Equal Pay Act's scope

By Richard Carelli, Associated Press, 01/18/00

WASHINGTON -- In a surprising move, the Supreme Court today ordered lower courts to restudy rulings that said states and their agencies must abide by a 1963 federal law requiring employers to give men and women equal pay for equal work.

 HIGH COURT COVERAGE
01/18/00
-In surprising move, court orders restudy of Equal Pay Act's scope
-U.S. Supreme Court sides with Network Solutions on fees
-Court rejects challenge to school closings on Good Friday
-Justices vote against Liddy in defamation suit

01/14/00
-Court looks at gays in scouts issue
-Court weighs in on abortion

01/12/00
-Driver's license info sales barred
-Convicts can't refuse law help
-Police can stop those who run
-Affirmative action suit allowed
-Citizen can sue alleged polluters
-Court weighs grandparents' rights

01/11/00
-Court examines rape suits
-States win age-bias victory

01/10/00
-Limits on AIDS insurance
-Microsoft stock ruling stands
-"Got Milk?" survives challenge
-Penn. sex law appeal rejected
-HMO tobacco suits disallowed
-Wal-Mart can't avoid payment



   

The court, issuing brief orders in cases from Illinois and New York, said those rulings should be reconsidered in light of its decision last week that said state employees are not protected by a federal law banning age bias.

Today's orders are surprising because last week's decision emphasized that age bias is not subject to the same level of judicial scrutiny as race and gender bias.

In one of the cases acted on today, Illinois State University officials seek to get out from under a 1995 class-action lawsuit that accuses the school in Normal, Ill., of paying its female professors less than their male colleagues.

School officials contend the federal Equal Pay Act, when applied to state employees, violates states' 11th Amendment immunity from being sued in federal courts.

The lawsuit, filed by professors Iris Varner, Teresa Palmer and Paula Pomerenke, also accused Illinois State of violating a federal anti-bias law known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That law, and that part of the lawsuit, was not at issue in the appeal acted on today.

A federal trial judge and the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the university's contention that it could not be sued under the Equal Pay Act. The school's lawyers argued that Congress lacked the authority, and never intended, to make the law nullify states' 11th Amendment immunity.

The university officials contend that state employees invoking the federal law must sue in state courts.

In the second case, officials at the State University of New York at New Paltz are trying to escape an Equal Pay Act lawsuit by Dr. Janice W. Anderson, a tenured associate professor in the school's communications and media department.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the school and said Anderson could invoke the federal law because Congress had wiped out New York's 11th Amendment immunity in such cases.

The cases are Illinois State University vs. Varner, 98-1117, and State University of New York at New Paltz vs. Anderson, 98-1845.

 
 


Advertise on Boston.com

or
Use Boston.com to do business with the Boston Globe:
advertise, subscribe, contact the news room, and more.

Click here for assistance.
Please read our user agreement and user information privacy policy.

© Copyright 2000 Boston Globe Electronic Publishing, Inc.