Statewide results of Spring 2004 MCAS
The following tables and figures provide summary performance level results for the 2004 MCAS tests. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. For the purpose of computing school, district, and state results, students who were absent from any subject area MCAS test without a medically-documented excuse were assigned the minimum raw score and performance level of Warning for that subject area. These results include regular education students, students with disabilities, and limited English proficient students. Source: State Department of Education.
| |
% of students at each performance level | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced | Proficient | Needs Improv. |
Warning/ Failing |
|||
| Grade 3 Reading | ||||||
| 2004 | (1) | 63 | 30 | 7 | ||
| 2003 | (1) | 63 | 31 | 6 | ||
| 2002 | (1) | 67 | 27 | 6 | ||
| 2001 | (1) | 62 | 31 | 7 | ||
| Grade 4 English | ||||||
| 2004 | 11 | 45 | 35 | 10 | ||
| 2003 | 10 | 46 | 34 | 9 | ||
| 2002 | 8 | 46 | 37 | 10 | ||
| 2001 | 7 | 44 | 38 | 11 | ||
| 2000 (2) | 6 | 43 | 35 | 16 | ||
| Grade 4 Mathematics | ||||||
| 2004 | 14 | 28 | 44 | 14 | ||
| 2003 | 12 | 28 | 44 | 16 | ||
| 2002 | 12 | 27 | 42 | 19 | ||
| 2001 | 10 | 24 | 46 | 19 | ||
| 2000 | 12 | 28 | 42 | 18 | ||
| 1999 | 12 | 24 | 44 | 19 | ||
| 1998 | 11 | 23 | 44 | 23 | ||
| Grade 5 Science and Tech/Engineering | ||||||
| 2004 | 20 | 35 | 33 | 13 | ||
| 2003 | 19 | 33 | 34 | 14 | ||
| Grade 6 Mathematics | ||||||
| 2004 | 17 | 26 | 32 | 25 | ||
| 2003 | 16 | 26 | 32 | 26 | ||
| 2002 | 13 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
| 2001 | 13 | 23 | 30 | 33 | ||
| Grade 7 English | ||||||
| 2004 | 9 | 59 | 25 | 7 | ||
| 2003 | 8 | 58 | 28 | 7 | ||
| 2002 | 9 | 55 | 28 | 9 | ||
| 2001 | 6 | 49 | 32 | 12 | ||
| Grade 8 Mathematics | ||||||
| 2004 | 13 | 26 | 32 | 29 | ||
| 2003 | 12 | 25 | 30 | 33 | ||
| 2002 | 11 | 23 | 33 | 33 | ||
| 2001 | 11 | 23 | 34 | 31 | ||
| 2000 | 10 | 24 | 27 | 39 | ||
| 1999 | 6 | 22 | 31 | 40 | ||
| 1998 | 8 | 23 | 26 | 42 | ||
| Grade 8 Science and Tech/Engineering | ||||||
| 2004 | 5 | 28 | 35 | 31 | ||
| 2003 | 4 | 28 | 37 | 30 | ||
| Grade 10 English | ||||||
| 2004 | 19 | 43 | 27 | 11 | ||
| 2003 | 20 | 41 | 28 | 11 | ||
| 2002 | 19 | 40 | 27 | 14 | ||
| 2001 | 15 | 36 | 31 | 18 | ||
| 2000 | 7 | 29 | 30 | 34 | ||
| 1999 | 4 | 30 | 34 | 32 | ||
| 1998 | 5 | 33 | 34 | 28 | ||
| Grade 10 Mathematics | ||||||
| 2004 | 29 | 28 | 28 | 15 | ||
| 2003 | 24 | 27 | 29 | 20 | ||
| 2002 | 20 | 24 | 31 | 25 | ||
| 2001 | 18 | 27 | 30 | 25 | ||
| 2000 | 15 | 18 | 22 | 45 | ||
| 1999 | 9 | 15 | 23 | 53 | ||
| 1998 | 7 | 17 | 24 | 52 | ||
| (1) No differentiation was made between Advanced and Proficient in 3rd grade English. (2) 2000 Grade 4 English results are reported here using the performance standards established in 2001. |
||||||
