boston.com News your connection to The Boston Globe
GLOBE EDITORIAL

T for tardy

THERE WILL always be unhappy customers in any business that measures its own performance based on "mean distance between failures." But that's reality at the MBTA, where state transit officials are trying to prepare riders for sharp fare increases in January.

It won't be an easy sell. Commuter rail service was miserably erratic this summer, exacerbating the area's transportation woes caused by the ceiling collapse in the Interstate-90 connector. Pressure from Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority general manager Daniel Grabauskas is having a positive effect on recent performance by the Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company, a private consortium that operates the commuter rail system. But it is hard to imagine that commuters would sit still for a 20 to 25 percent fare increase should service suffer again.

The commuter rail operator broke a central rule of railway systems by not keeping enough passenger cars and locomotives in reserve to account for inevitable mechanical problems. And T officials failed to monitor their contractor adequately.

Now, at least, the T has some clout. In about six months, Grabauskas will decide whether to extend the $1.07 billion contract or rebid it. ``If service is like this summer," warns the T boss, ``I go back out to bid."

Grabauskas promises that all of the system's 68 subway stations will be outfitted with automated fare collection capabilities, including the reusable plastic CharlieCard, by the time the fare hikes kick in. He predicts fare revenues will increase by 3 or 4 percent because the card system will cut down on ``leakage" from fare evaders. Also on the plus side, riders who use both subway trains and buses in their daily commute are in store for free transfers, which could actually lower the cost of their ride. But it is not so clear how fare increases from $1.25 to $1.70 for subway rides and from 90 cents to $1.25 for buses translate into better service for commuters. And occasional riders without CharlieCards could be looking at subway fares as high as $2.25 and bus fares reaching $1.60.

Fare increases might be bearable if they coincided with clear improvements to the T's public address systems, which evoke distress calls from distant ships breaking up at sea, and upgrades of LED message boards to include reliable arrival times for the next train. Grabauskas says that many such communication improvements will be in place by the end of 2007. Major upgrades to security systems, including radio interoperability for first responders, are also coming on line, he says.

Transit riders don't care that the T strains under debt service that consumes about a third of the authority's annual operating budget. They want reliability, safety, and cleanliness. That's what the T must provide before it can justify hiking fares.

SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
 
Today (free)
Yesterday (free)
Past 30 days
Last 12 months
 Advanced search / Historic Archives