boston.com News your connection to The Boston Globe

What marriage debate is really about

SIX OF THE 12 people our children call "aunt" or "uncle" are gay. We share our lives with these people. We celebrate the holidays, trade off baby-sitting, walk each other's dogs, and bury our dead with these people. The three gay couples in our family have been with their partners for all of the nearly two decades of our children's existence. These couples have college degrees and great jobs. They own nice houses, pay high taxes, make donations, and volunteer for good causes. They always vote. We have read the arguments in favor of outlawing gay marriage. We have tried to understand the reasoning of clergy and conservatives as it applies to our family. The best we can figure is that those arguments support maintaining the family as the basic unit of society. The contention is that our society cannot continue and our government cannot endure without the basic heterosexual family unit intact. However, our family has remained intact. Millions of other families have had the same experience. Still millions of others have been fractured and sundered, even though heterosexual couples started them with the most sincere intentions.

 

Homosexuality does not portend the dissolution of society any more than heterosexuality guarantees its preservation.

Perhaps the real reason there is so much opposition to gay unions is that many feel that homosexuality is immoral. Opponents insist we must not condone or sanction this. Perhaps an outbreak of other "immoralities" will follow. We cannot presume to tell you whether same-sex partnerships are moral or immoral. That's your call. But we can ask you to consider this question: Do you want your government in the business of legislating the morality of its citizens? What national, state, or city government would you trust to decide what is or is not moral? Do you believe it is the government's role to regulate whom you love or how you express your love? You don't have to answer these questions, but your representatives must. And soon.

This debate is not about what "we" should "allow" others to do. It is about the rights of citizens and the role of government.

JUDY MILLER

WAYNE P. MILLER

Beverly

SEARCH GLOBE ARCHIVES
   
Globe Archives
Today (free)
Yesterday (free)
Past 30 days
Last 12 months