THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
Critical Faculties

Go ahead...I dare ya!

With its sweeping new antiabortion law, South Dakota has 'dared' the Supreme Court, as one scholar puts it, to overturn Roe. Is this a clever legal strategy, or a reckless affront to the Constitution?

By Christopher Shea
April 23, 2006

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Text size +

SO IS THIS WHAT a constitutional revolution looks like, when it starts? Americans have grown used to the idea that abortion rights, as established by Roe v. Wade, are getting chipped away at-by parental-consent laws, waiting periods, and the like. But the law signed last month by South Dakota's governor banning virtually all abortions represents a startlingly direct attack on ... (Full article: 1134 words)

This article is available in our archives:

Globe Subscribers

FREE for subscribers

Subscribers to the Boston Globe get unlimited access to our archives.

Not a subscriber?

Non-Subscribers

Purchase an electronic copy of the full article. Learn More

  • $9.95 1 month archives pass
  • $24.95 3 months archives pass
  • $74.95 1 year archives pass