![]()
Jan Freeman writes The Word column for Ideas.
Joshua Glenn is a Boston-based writer, editor, and multimedia
producer.
Christopher Shea writes the Critical Faculties column for Ideas.
Send the Brainiac bloggers a
comment on a post.
Week of:
November 11
Week of:
November 4
Week of:
October 28
Week of:
October 21
Week of:
October 14
Week of:
October 7
Mind the gap
Shop talk What he learned in the newsroom Mr. Boffo lays an eggcorn Curse of the mummy's tummy More in Word Watch |
« What's up playmaker? | Main | Boston Herald Tribune? » Friday, October 6, 2006Okay, fine, more on FoleyI'd been resisting joining the vast fray over L'Affaire Foley, but this post by the hugely popoular blogger Andrew Sullivan deserves some comment. Sullivan takes the line that the issue has been overblown, because "we have no evidence (yet) of any actual sex; if we did, and it had happened in D.C., it would not have been legally under-age, because the age of consent is 16.... Now can we all calm down ... ?" Sure, it would be better if we were all discussing war, torture, and climate change, as Sullivan says, but he is awfully soft on Foley. And it's surprising that Sullivan should be surprised or even dismayed that the scandal has mushroomed. Of course, the big issue here, as in nearly all political scandals, is less about the behavior but the alleged cover-up. How the House leadership did or did not deal with Foley's misbehavior is a genuine national concern. Posted by Evan Hughes at 09:24 AM
|

