boston.com News your connection to The Boston Globe
Brainiac - What's happening in the world of ideas
Jan Freeman writes The Word column for Ideas.
Joshua Glenn is a Boston-based writer, editor, and multimedia producer.
Christopher Shea writes the Critical Faculties column for Ideas.
Ideas Mailbag
Send the Brainiac bloggers a comment on a post.
Name:
E-mail:
Your comment:
See the latest Ideas stories that appeared in The Boston Globe.
 Visit the Ideas section
Week of: November 11
Week of: November 4
Week of: October 28
Week of: October 21
Week of: October 14
Week of: October 7

« Shooting fish in a barrel, or, TV-news ethics | Main | Why college sports? »

Wednesday, January 3, 2007

Will you make choices this year?

At WebMetricsGuru, a site I rarely visit about "Web analytics," the writer, Marshall Sponder, who has a search engine marketing consultancy, points out an article in yesterday's New York Times that is currently the most emailed on nytimes.com. It's a pretty fascinating article, summing up with a nice synthesis the current thinking about the old problem of free will vs. determinism -- in other words, the question of whether we act on choices we are free to make or whether we're a bunch of atoms bouncing around in ways already determined by the laws of physics.

Sponder's post isn't too enlightening compared to the piece itself, but he picks out some good quotes and captures what I also took to be the flavor of the research findings reported in the Times -- that sadly things couldn't have gone differently than they have. One example: it seems we actually have conscious thoughts about, say, choosing to punch someone just after our limbs starts moving, though we experience it in the reverse order. In other words, if that finding is to be believed, we interpret what we do in retrospect as the result of a decision that never took place.

Daniel Dennett, the controversial atheist philosopher, is quoted in the piece presenting a "third way" interpretation, trying to make free will compatible with determinism, as other philosophers have. But it isn't clear in the article exactly what he means. Has anyone read the relevant Dennett work? Maybe you, Josh?

Sponsored Links