boston.com News your connection to The Boston Globe
Brainiac - What's happening in the world of ideas
Jan Freeman writes The Word column for Ideas.
Joshua Glenn is a Boston-based writer, editor, and multimedia producer.
Christopher Shea writes the Critical Faculties column for Ideas.
Ideas Mailbag
Send the Brainiac bloggers a comment on a post.
Name:
E-mail:
Your comment:
See the latest Ideas stories that appeared in The Boston Globe.
 Visit the Ideas section
Week of: November 11
Week of: November 4
Week of: October 28
Week of: October 21
Week of: October 14
Week of: October 7

« The plurals of 'Prius' | Main | Tuesday's Talkfest »

Monday, March 12, 2007

Naipaul and India

An interesting if not wholly original essay by V.S. Naipaul (is this an excerpt?) in the Guardian. It is about his origins as a writer, his techniques, and the ways he had to adapt his writing to the world as he experienced it. One of the most engaging passages, and one of Naipaul's defining characteristics, is that he doesn't claim any great kinship with his marginalized homeland:

I was born in 1932 on the other side of the Atlantic in the British colony of Trinidad, an outcrop of Venezuela and South America. It was a small island, essentially agricultural when I was born (like Venezuela, it had oil, which was beginning to be developed). It had a racially mixed population of perhaps half a million, with my own immigrant Asian Indian community (finely divided by religion, education, money, caste background) of about 150,000.

I had no great love for the place, no love for its colonial smallness. I saw myself as a castaway from the world's old civilisations, and I wished to be part of that bigger world as soon as possible. An academic scholarship in 1950, when I was 18, enabled me to leave. I went to England to do a university course with the ambition afterwards of being a writer. I never in any real sense went back.

Nevertheless, Naipaul went back to the colonized world when he wrote now famous nonfiction about India, a process he recounts in the second half of the essay. Worth a read.

Sponsored Links