Health bill has coverage problems
Disabled workers face Medicare wait
WASHINGTON - Disabled by chronic back pain and unable to afford medical insurance, Lea Walker hoped President Obama’s health care overhaul would close a coverage gap that has trapped her and millions of other workers.
Although disabled workers can expect improvements, the legislation moving toward final passage in Congress doesn’t deliver the clean fix that advocates for people with serious medical conditions had wanted. Some of the neediest could find themselves still in limbo.
In 2007, the government declared Walker, a home health nurse from Indian Trail, N.C., too sick to work. She started receiving monthly disability checks from Social Security but found she would face a 24-month wait for Medicare. Insurance available through her husband’s job was out of reach at $800 a month.
At any given time, an estimated 1.8 million disabled workers languish in the Medicare coverage gap, a cost-saver instituted nearly 40 years ago. Many, such as Walker, are uninsured. Lawmakers had hoped to eliminate the gap as part of the health care legislation but concluded it would be too expensive.
The alternatives now in the legislation aren’t seamless. For example, a new insurance pool for high-risk cases that Obama sought could run out of money within a year or two of its inception.
“I’m very disappointed,’’ said Walker, 61, who has difficulty walking to her front door.
Although her own wait will be over in April, “I feel these last two years have dealt me a blow I will not recover from,’’ she said. She has been unable to pursue surgery that could help her and had to rely on a sympathetic doctor for free medication samples.
The failure to repeal the Medicare waiting period illustrates the difficult trade-offs Democratic lawmakers faced to keep the costs of the legislation from ballooning. For example, if the bill passes Congress and is signed by Obama, about 18 million eligible Americans would remain uninsured, many still unable to afford coverage, even when the legislation is fully in place in 2019.
“I think everyone needs to realize this is going to be a first, very major step toward health care reform and then there will be a need to come back in the next several years and make midcourse adjustments,’’ said Senator Jeff Bingaman, a New Mexico Democrat who pushed unsuccessfully to phase out the waiting period.
“I think what we are hopefully going to be able to do with this bill is fix an awful lot of the problem,’’ Bingaman added.
The legislation would provide two ways to help disabled workers in the Medicare waiting period. But it’s not clear how well that would work.
Starting this year, people who can’t get affordable private insurance because of medical problems could buy a policy through the new high-risk insurance pool.
But there could be a catch signing up for that pool. The Senate bill would require patients to be uninsured for six months. The House bill would allow people to be covered immediately in cases of medical necessity. Lawmakers will have to work out the difference.
Longer term, by 2014 at the latest, disabled workers would be able to buy coverage in new health insurance markets called exchanges. Open to individuals and small businesses, the markets would take over the role of the high-risk pools.
New consumer protections would take effect, prohibiting insurers from turning down people with health problems or charging them higher premiums. Government subsidies would start to flow to consumers in the exchanges. Medicaid would be expanded to pick up adults near the poverty line.
Yet potential problems have appeared.
The $5 billion that the Obama administration and Congress have allocated to finance the high-risk insurance pool appears to be well short of the need, according to a report by economic analysts at Medicare. They project the money would run out in 2011 or 2012, and the safety net would fail for an estimated 375,000 frail individuals.
Advocacy groups say they would ask Congress for emergency dollars. The administration says the $5 billion is consistent with an earlier cost estimate from the Congressional Budget Office.
Finally, it’s not yet clear how comprehensive the coverage would be once the bill is fully phased in.
While the legislation would not eliminate the Medicare waiting period for disabled workers, it should make it more tolerable, say patient advocates.
“If you look at the bill in terms of perfection, there are many shortcomings,’’ said Stephen Finan, policy director for the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. “But if you look at it relative to the status quo, it represents a very significant improvement for people with serious medical conditions.’’
Walker, the North Carolina nurse, doesn’t see it that way.
“It’s atrocious that in America we would have people with medical problems bad enough that they can’t work, and they’re not be able to afford to seek medical help,’’ she said. “I just can’t believe they didn’t cut out the two-year wait.’’