< Back to front page Text size +

SJC upholds biolab ruling requiring further environmental review

Posted by Karen Weintraub  December 13, 2007 12:38 PM
  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

By Stephen Smith, Globe Staff

The state's highest court today delivered a victory to opponents of a controversial research laboratory being built by Boston University, ordering that an ongoing environmental review should continue. The Supreme Judicial Court also agreed with a 2006 ruling from a superior court judge that the state's original environmental analysis was "arbitrary and capricious."

The decision by the SJC, though, does not halt construction of the laboratory complex in Boston's South End, which is about 70 percent complete. The centerpiece of the project is a Biosafety Level-4 lab where scientists will be able to work with the world's deadliest germs, including Ebola, plague, and anthrax.

The case wound up before the SJC because BU had appealed the earlier ruling by Suffolk Superior Court Judge Ralph D. Gants.

In its decision, the top court ruled that the review by the state environmental affairs secretary during the administration of Governor Mitt Romney "lacked a rational basis."

Today's decision represents the second time in two weeks that environmental reviews of the BU project have been lambasted. An independent panel of scientists declared two weeks ago that a separate federal review of the lab was "not sound and credible" and failed to adequately address the consequences of highly lethal germs escaping from the project.

  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

About white coat notes

White Coat Notes covers the latest from the health care industry, hospitals, doctors offices, labs, insurers, and the corridors of government. Chelsea Conaboy previously covered health care for The Philadelphia Inquirer. Write her at cconaboy@boston.com. Follow her on Twitter: @cconaboy.
health answers

Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

Health search

Find news and information on:
archives