Boston researchers find genetic trigger for 1 percent of autism
By Carey Goldberg, Globe Staff
Boston-based autism researchers have pinpointed a genetic "hot spot" where DNA errors appear to increase a child's chances of developing autism one-hundred-fold.
The discovery, reported on-line in the New England Journal of Medicine this afternoon, stems from the most extensive genome scanning for autism done so far. The scans found that in just over 1 percent of people with autism, a chunk of about 25 genes had been either duplicated or deleted, mainly in spontaneous mutations not carried by their parents.
Some researchers believe such copy-number errors help explain how autism can often crop up in families seemingly out of nowhere. Diagnoses of autism have skyrocketed in recent years, and the disorder now affects an estimated 1 in every 150 American children.
"It's like having a recipe where you take some of the ingredients and use half as much or twice as much," said Dr. David T. Miller of Children's Hospital Boston. "It's going to change how the recipe turns out."
One percent may sound small, Miller said. But "it is significant in terms of getting another piece of the puzzle solved" -- a puzzle that has largely stymied researchers even as parents have pleaded for answers and cures.
The findings also hold the promise that more such hot spots will explain a much larger portion of autism cases, and that studying the genes involved will cast new light on what goes wrong. Autism is seen as a spectrum of social and communication disorders that usually begin in early childhood.
The "hot spot" paper is the first major publication by a broad new Boston group, the Autism Consortium, that brings together families, doctors and researchers to try to crack the complex questions of autism.
The collaboration it fosters helped speed both the research and its applicability in the clinic, said Mark J. Daly of Massachusetts General Hospital, the paper's senior author.
"In genetics, it's almost unprecedented to have an initial scientific finding so immediately validated in active clinical samples and to see relevant diagnostic information fed back to clinicians and families," he said.
Using new high-resolution gene tests, Miller, working with a team at Children's, had noticed the "hot spot" in a few patients a year ago, he said, but he'd had to tell the parents, "Well, we found something," but "we don't quite know what it means."
Meanwhile, Daly and his colleagues at Mass. General were using the cutting-edge gene scans on DNA samples from families with autistic children nationwide, seeking new genetic culprits. Among hundreds of children from that nationwide sample and hundreds more who had been tested at Children's, they found mutations in an area of Chromosome 16 in about 1 percent of those with autism.
Further confirmation came from the extensive DNA testing done in recent years in Iceland. Analysis of Icelandic samples showed mutations in the hot spot in 1 percent of people with autism; one-tenth of 1 percent in people with different language or psychiatric problems; and just one one-hundredth of 1 percent in the general population.
For Morrie and Robin Lewin of Grafton, the hot spot findings have personal relevance. Their 10-year-old twin sons, Nathaniel and Austin, who are developmentally delayed, both tested positive for mutations in the key hot spot area when Miller had their genes tested. At first, he could not tell them what that meant; now he can.
"For us, it basically means that we now have a diagnosis," Robin Lewin said, "and sometimes that makes it easier when you're trying to get services for your child." The boys have none of the classic social symptoms of autism, she said, but it could help that she can say they have "this new chromosomal disorder."
The findings could also help other parents as they make family planning decisions, Miller said. Normally, when parents have one autistic child, their chances of having another one are about 5 percent. But if testing shows that a parent has the new mutation and could thus pass it down, the chance of having another autistic child could be 50 percent, he said.
More generally, he said, "One of the things parents struggle with is, 'Why does my child have autism?' Was it something I did? Was it something I didn't do?" New genetic findings, he said, can help parents know "there really was another explanation they had nothing to do with."
Scientists have no explanation for why such new mutations happen, Miller said, other than that they seem to occur randomly during the complex reshuffling of parental genes in earliest development, and certain spots are especially susceptible to it.
The hot-spot paper is extremely well done, said Michael Wigler of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, who was not involved with it but works on genetic hot spots himself.
Last year, Wigler and his team published a paper boldly predicting that, as the resolution of gene scans improves and more new mutations can be detected, they will turn out to explain some 75 percent of autism cases.
"I predict we will find many more new mutations causing severe cognitive disorders," he said.
Carey Goldberg can be reached at goldberg@globe.com.



Is this an X-linked finding?
Mary Lou,
No, it's not X-linked. The "hot spot" is on chromosome 16.
What are the 25 genes that are impacted?
I saw something on the news tonight about the Lewin family that I would like to ask you about. They said their sons had an autism spectrum disorder (I assumed PDD-NOS), not autistic disorder (classic autism). If so, the mom's statement above "The boys have none of the classic social symptoms of autism" made me think they weren't on the autism spectrum. Can you clarify this for me? Thank you, and thanks for writing about this exciting development.
Jim,
It is not clear what the genes do. That's one of the next things the researchers plan to study.
Barbsboy,
Mrs. Lewin said her sons were developmentally delayed but did not have a diagnosis of autism.
Hooray, Let's abort all the children with the potential autism.
Let's abort Einstein, Mozart etc. The world will be much happier and
simpler, and stupider. That is for sure.
GREAT NEWS!!!!!! We have two sons affected by autism. One has been enrolled through the Massachusetts Consortium and we are waiting for his results. Congratulations to the researchers!!!
I have a daughter severely affected with autism. I'm curious about the testing procedure for mutations on chromosome 16. Immediately after my daughter's diagnosis, she had several blood test/lab work for any kind of abnormalities. Would this type of abnormality show up on routine testing?
1% with the hot spot.....mmmm doesn't seem helpful for the other 99% without the chromosome hot spot still fighting for independence and on the spectrum....more pieces to the puzzle...can we get sub catagories within the spectrum? How do we define them in a practical functional way?..Can the hot spot be recoded by replication of dna sequence? Interesting Ethics and science topic huh?
Gayla,
This abnormality would not turn up on routine testing.
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
Contributors
blogger
Boston Globe Health and Science staff:
browse this blog
by categoryrelated links
INside Boston.com