< Back to front page Text size +

NIH funding ripples: We're No. 2

Posted by Elizabeth Cooney  June 18, 2008 11:59 AM
  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Federal funding for biomedical research fans out from the labs and clinics where research takes place, boosting jobs, earnings, and business activity. A report released today calculates that broad economic benefit state by state, warning the spinoff could sputter if funding isn’t increased.

Massachusetts pulled in $2.3 billion from the National Institutes of Health in fiscal 2007, behind only California’s $3.5 billion, among seven states in the billion-dollar club. According to the formula used by the national healthcare-consumer organization Families USA , every dollar from NIH produced more than $2 in new business in the 50 states, from cars to construction. In Massachusetts, the figure was $2.14 in new goods and services for every NIH dollar its universities, hospitals, and research institutes received. That multiplier wasn’t enough to put it in the top 10 states, led by Texas with a spinoff of $2.49 per NIH dollar.

Massachusetts trailed number-one California in new jobs created (30,864), total wages from new jobs ($1.8 billion) and average wages per new job ($58,801, which tops the national average of $52,112).

NIH funding has stayed the essentially the same since 2003, after a period of doubling. After accounting for inflation, purchasing power of the NIH budget has declined by 13 percent. The Families USA report predicted what a potential 6.6 percent increase in NIH funding would mean, using the same economic multiplier calculation. Massachusetts could see a gain of $310 million in new business, the report said, with 808 new jobs and a $112 million boost in Bay State wages.

"As Congress evaluates NIH funding, it should keep in mind the interrelated set of benefits that flow from that funding," the report concludes. "An NIH budget that falls short of what's needed hurts lab, hospitals, and communities."

  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

About white coat notes

White Coat Notes covers the latest from the health care industry, hospitals, doctors offices, labs, insurers, and the corridors of government. Chelsea Conaboy previously covered health care for The Philadelphia Inquirer. Write her at cconaboy@boston.com. Follow her on Twitter: @cconaboy.
health answers

Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

Health search

Find news and information on:
archives