< Back to front page Text size +

A challenging test for OB-GYNs

Posted by Elizabeth Cooney June 8, 2009 09:38 AM

There is a risk of miscarriage when doctors perform a test on pregnant women to see if their fetus has Down syndrome, a Tufts Medical Center obstetrician-gynecologist writes in today's Wall Street Journal.

Dr. Adam Wolfberg says he recently referred a patient to a more experienced doctor to do the test, called chorionic villus sampling for the cells a needle siphons from the placenta. He based his decision on reports that show the more CVS procedures a doctor does, the fewer miscarriages. The risk is estimated to be about 1 percent, higher than for amniocentesis, which is performed later in pregnancy.

That raises the question of how to acquire proficiency.

"CVS mavens got that way by practicing, so their present-day patients benefit at the expense of previous patients," Wolfberg writes.

Fewer than 100 doctors are trained in CVS in the United States each year, he writes, meaning there aren't enough doctors to meet demand. After performing his 15th supervised CVS, he is considered trained. None of his patients miscarried.

"I have colleagues who have done the procedure 1,500 times, but they are swamped and I probably won't refer my patients to them," he writes. "I'll do CVS myself."

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

about white coat notes We post updates every weekday about the region's hospitals, labs and medical schools – covering everything from the latest research findings to what's on the minds of the innovative doctors, nurses and scientists who work here. Send news items and tips to whitecoat@globe.com

Contributors

blogger

Elizabeth Cooney is a former health reporter for the Worcester Telegram & Gazette, where she also was a business reporter and an editor. Earlier in her career, she edited medical books and journals at Little, Brown, and worked for Boston magazine.

Boston Globe Health and Science staff:

archives