< Back to front page Text size +

Not taking medications as intended costs $290B a year, report says

Posted by Elizabeth Cooney August 13, 2009 03:35 PM

Patients who don't take their medications as prescribed pay a price in poorer health, more frequent hospitalizations, and a higher risk of death. They also incur up to $290 billion annually in increased medical costs, according to a Boston-based health policy group that urges making the issue part of the national debate on overhauling health care.

A report released this week by the New England Healthcare Institute updates a 2001 analysis of the costs of what is called poor patient medication adherence. The new report is based on seven systematic reviews of the medical literature as well as interviews with 16 health care organizations, insurers, drug makers, and technology companies. The work was paid for by this group of stakeholders, but the report was written independently of them, institute executive director Valerie Fleishman said.

"Much of the discussion in health reform today is really about providing better outcomes for patients, and ultimately better health and medication adherence is a fundamental missing link to better outcomes," Fleishman said in an interview. "We believe that it's critical that adherence be woven into the fabric of the health reform debate."

From one-third to one-half of patients in the United States don't take their medications as their doctors intend them to, the report says. Some don't pick up or renew prescriptions, some don't take their medicine in the proper doses or at the right times, and others stop taking them altogether, the report says. The many reasons include cost, unpleasant side effects, confusion about the regimen, forgetfulness, language barriers, and feeling "too good" to need medicine.

People who have chronic illnesses such as diabetes or high blood pressure are less likely to take their medications as intended than people being treated for an urgent problem. One study cited in the report found that the death rate among diabetic and heart patients was 7 percent among patients who took their medications diligently but 12 percent among patient who didn't. Hospitalization rates showed similar gaps.

Rigorous research on the dimensions of the medication problem and its causes is more extensive than research on what might work to help alleviate the problem, the new report says. Small studies have pointed to some promising approaches. Simplifying drug regimens, which could mean prescribing pills to take once a day instead of four times a day, could help patients, particularly those on multiple medications. Educating patients about their disease and their drugs, especially as they leave the hospital, also appears to help. Case managers and pharmacists can also play a role, some studies say. Lowering costs also can improve adherence.

The health care institute recommends some systemwide changes, such as revamping how health care providers are paid. Rather than reimbursing doctors based on the number of patients they see, they could instead be paid based on how well their patients are doing.

"If physicians and other care providers are reimbursed for better health outcomes, we believe that will go a long way toward driving adherence because providers will have incentives to invest in the time and resources and counseling and technology and other tools that are really needed to educate patients and in some cases to change their behavior and to really move the needle on adherence," Fleishman said.

Other recommendations include using health information technology to monitor what happens after the electronic prescription is beamed to the pharmacy and to manage multiple medication regimens.

Dr. Jerry Gurwitz, a University of Massachusetts Medical School geriatrician who has researched drug errors, said keeping patients on the medications they need is a pressing problem, especially among older people who live alone and might suffer from age-related cognitive impairment. He was not involved in the New England Healthcare Institute report.

"I think any person who is practicing medicine is going to say it's one of the biggest challenges and frustrations of providing care to patients right now," he said. "In terms of directly providing care to patients and seeking the best outcomes, this is just overwhelming. I can give an anecdote for every day I see patients."

Today he saw a patient who needs to take potassium supplements because her blood-pressure medication leads to lower levels of the essential nutrient. Her lab tests had showed low potassium levels, so he increased her prescription from four to five pills a day and scheduled another lab test. She missed that test and told him she's not taking what he already prescribed. Now he's worried that she'll take either too little or too much.

"I can give her her medications for free and it's still not going to change," he said. "I can have a nurse or a care management person call, but I need a family member in the house."

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

6 comments so far...
  1. OK. What about factoring in the cost of prescriptions that are OVER PRESCRIBED? The ones that physicians write that patients know themselves they do not need such as oxycodin and percoset for minor medical issues? or dental work? How about antidepressants for someone who is *having a bad day* and is NOT chronically depressed? How about lisinprol for someone whose blood pressure has ALWAYS BEEN A LITTLE above the normal range and knows it but whose doctor thinks they need the prescription anyway? What about the costs of THESE non conforming prescriptions?
    JB

    Posted by Jesse Black August 13, 09 06:12 PM
  1. The pharmaceutical industry of course will point to the 290 billion number to justify their outrageous prices, however the whole medical industry is so far out of wack that it needs a complete overhaul and I'm not sure why people are protesting that. We spend twice as much on healthcare, which makes us less competetive in the global market. For all the money we spend, our world health ranking is not even in the top 20. Our health care workers of which I am one(pharmacist) don't spend as much time with patients as they want or need to as the system does not allow it.. Finally many people can't afford health care. We need to fix it now!

    Posted by alamojoe August 13, 09 06:44 PM
  1. What indices's is the New England Healthcare Institute using to establish what the healthcare costs would be for those individuals if they had lived another 5, 10 or 15 years in average, poor or constantly declining health? You can't just say that people didn't do this so it cost "X" number of dollars without the corollary. And since there is no factual way to ascertain that, it rends the silly study meaningless.

    Want a study? Do your own of patients hurt by doctors foisting unnecessary treatment and medication on them to the detriment of their well-being, let alone the cost...

    Posted by not fooled August 13, 09 07:30 PM
  1. Nice article.......well known phenomenon to anyone in medicine. Many admissions and readmissions would be prevented if people would do what they were asked/instructed to do. Obama's reference Tuesday to physicians and mechanics being responsible to fix problems that arise after being treated (or repaired) for free doesn't hold any water whatsoever. If you get your car fixed, and it breaks down 2 days later because you put sugar in your gastank or get into 2 different fender-benders, should the mechanic fix it for free ? Umm, no. If you are discharged from a hospital after being treated for congestive heart failure, take only half of your medications, go home and eat lots of salty foods and get readmitted within 3 days, why shouldn't the patient get the full bill for that and not the insurance company since it's the patient's fault and NOT the physician's /hospital;s ? Medicine in this country will not improve until people take responsibility for their own health and not point blame elsewhere

    Posted by frustratedMD August 13, 09 08:46 PM
  1. I am a pharmacist. I agree many doctors over prescribe. But there are also many disease states that require compliance with medications, taken properly medications save lives, and in the long run save money by preventing the need for costly hospitalizations, emergency room visits, nursing home stays. Health care reform should focus on prevention and compliance.

    Posted by rxman August 13, 09 10:19 PM
  1. I don't believe this. Shades of "1984." I don't want to live in a nation that has that much control over their citizens. I remember when a doctor prescribed a medication that gave my husband heart pains, and when he told his doctor, the doctor told him take it anyhow because that was NOT a side effect of the medication. He consulted with a cardiologist who said that could be a side effect for some people. When he quit taking the medication, the heart pains stopped. I don't want to get into a fight about it, but it is after all MY BODY,

    Posted by Skeeter October 4, 09 10:50 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

about white coat notes We post updates every weekday about the region's hospitals, labs and medical schools – covering everything from the latest research findings to what's on the minds of the innovative doctors, nurses and scientists who work here. Send news items and tips to whitecoat@globe.com

Contributors

blogger

Elizabeth Cooney is a former health reporter for the Worcester Telegram & Gazette, where she also was a business reporter and an editor. Earlier in her career, she edited medical books and journals at Little, Brown, and worked for Boston magazine.

Boston Globe Health and Science staff:

archives