< Back to front page Text size +

Dermatologists urge tighter rules for tanning beds

Posted by Elizabeth Cooney  March 25, 2010 11:00 AM
  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Dermatologists testifying before a federal panel today will urge more government oversight of indoor tanning beds, which they say are now classified in the same category as tongue depressors, despite evidence linking them to skin cancer.

An advisory group of the Food and Drug Administration is considering moving tanning beds from Class 1, which includes items that have minimal potential to cause harm, to Class 2, which would allow the agency to review tanning devices before they go to market, including claims for safety and efficacy.

"It is now known that ultraviolet light, whether it be sunlight, which is natural light, or artificial light through a tanning parlor, is a carcinogen," Dr. Mary Maloney, chief of dermatology and a professor of medicine at University of Massachusetts Medical School, said in an interview yesterday. She and other members of the American Academy of Dermatology are scheduled to speak at the day-long hearing.

Maloney would ultimately like to see tanning beds banned, but changing their classification is an important step, she said, citing research that has shown that squamous cell skin cancer is 2.5 times more common in people who use tanning beds and basal cell cancer is 1.5 times more common.

The dermatologists are also pushing the FDA to prohibit indoor tanning for children under 18 and to require people to give their written informed consent after  being told about the health risks of ultraviolet light exposure. "The real thing that I am going try and drive home is that for every decade earlier that people use tanning beds, there is a 20 percent increase in their odds ratio of getting a squamous cell cancer and a 10 percent increase in their odds ratio of getting basal cell cancer," Maloney said.

The Indoor Tanning Association, a national trade group,  said in a statement that it considers regulations currently in place to be sufficient to protect its customers, noting that many of the country's 18,000 salon owners already use informed consent forms. "The US tanning industry abides by the strongest set of industry regulations found anywhere in the world. Based on what we know today, we believe there is simply not enough information or body of science to warrant changing regulatory policy."

After today's hearings, the General and Plastic Surgery Devices Panel will make a recommendation to the FDA's Medical Devices Advisory Committee.
  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

About white coat notes

White Coat Notes covers the latest from the health care industry, hospitals, doctors offices, labs, insurers, and the corridors of government. Chelsea Conaboy previously covered health care for The Philadelphia Inquirer. Write her at cconaboy@boston.com. Follow her on Twitter: @cconaboy.
health answers

Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

Health search

Find news and information on:
archives