< Back to front page
Text size
–
+
Dermatologists urge tighter rules for tanning beds
Dermatologists testifying before a federal panel today will urge more government oversight of indoor tanning beds, which they say are now classified in the same category as tongue depressors, despite evidence linking them to skin cancer.
An advisory group of the Food and Drug Administration is considering moving tanning beds from Class 1, which includes items that have minimal potential to cause harm, to Class 2, which would allow the agency to review tanning devices before they go to market, including claims for safety and efficacy.
"It is now known that ultraviolet light, whether it be sunlight, which is natural light, or artificial light through a tanning parlor, is a carcinogen," Dr. Mary Maloney, chief of dermatology and a professor of medicine at University of Massachusetts Medical School, said in an interview yesterday. She and other members of the American Academy of Dermatology are scheduled to speak at the day-long hearing.
An advisory group of the Food and Drug Administration is considering moving tanning beds from Class 1, which includes items that have minimal potential to cause harm, to Class 2, which would allow the agency to review tanning devices before they go to market, including claims for safety and efficacy.
"It is now known that ultraviolet light, whether it be sunlight, which is natural light, or artificial light through a tanning parlor, is a carcinogen," Dr. Mary Maloney, chief of dermatology and a professor of medicine at University of Massachusetts Medical School, said in an interview yesterday. She and other members of the American Academy of Dermatology are scheduled to speak at the day-long hearing.
Maloney would ultimately like to see tanning beds banned, but changing
their classification is an important step, she said, citing research
that has shown that squamous cell skin cancer is 2.5 times more common
in people who use tanning beds and basal cell cancer is 1.5 times more
common.
The dermatologists are also pushing the FDA to prohibit indoor tanning for children under 18 and to require people to give their written informed consent after being told about the health risks of ultraviolet light exposure. "The real thing that I am going try and drive home is that for every decade earlier that people use tanning beds, there is a 20 percent increase in their odds ratio of getting a squamous cell cancer and a 10 percent increase in their odds ratio of getting basal cell cancer," Maloney said.
The Indoor Tanning Association, a national trade group, said in a statement that it considers regulations currently in place to be sufficient to protect its customers, noting that many of the country's 18,000 salon owners already use informed consent forms. "The US tanning industry abides by the strongest set of industry regulations found anywhere in the world. Based on what we know today, we believe there is simply not enough information or body of science to warrant changing regulatory policy."
After today's hearings, the General and Plastic Surgery Devices Panel will make a recommendation to the FDA's Medical Devices Advisory Committee.
The dermatologists are also pushing the FDA to prohibit indoor tanning for children under 18 and to require people to give their written informed consent after being told about the health risks of ultraviolet light exposure. "The real thing that I am going try and drive home is that for every decade earlier that people use tanning beds, there is a 20 percent increase in their odds ratio of getting a squamous cell cancer and a 10 percent increase in their odds ratio of getting basal cell cancer," Maloney said.
The Indoor Tanning Association, a national trade group, said in a statement that it considers regulations currently in place to be sufficient to protect its customers, noting that many of the country's 18,000 salon owners already use informed consent forms. "The US tanning industry abides by the strongest set of industry regulations found anywhere in the world. Based on what we know today, we believe there is simply not enough information or body of science to warrant changing regulatory policy."
After today's hearings, the General and Plastic Surgery Devices Panel will make a recommendation to the FDA's Medical Devices Advisory Committee.
About white coat notes
|
White Coat Notes covers the latest from the health care industry, hospitals, doctors offices, labs, insurers, and the corridors of government. Chelsea Conaboy previously covered health care for The Philadelphia Inquirer. Write her at cconaboy@boston.com. Follow her on Twitter: @cconaboy. |
health answers
Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

Health search

archives
Browse this blog
by category
Beth Israel DeaconessBoston Medical Center
Boston University
Brigham Womens
Broad Institute
Cambridge Health
Steward
Childrens
DanaFarber
Harvard University
Joslin
Lahey
MIT
Mass General
Mass Health Law
McLean
Mental Health
New England Baptist
Public Health
Short White Coat
Tufts Medical Center
Tufts University
UMass
UMass Memorial
VA Medical Centers
Health Events
health resources
- Diseases About.com disease information
- Symptom checker What your symptoms could mean
- Drugs A-Z Side effects, drug interactions, and more
- Lab Test Interpreter What your lab results mean
- Natural Medicine A-Z Safety of herbs, supplements
- Flu.gov Government flu information
- CDC.gov Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Be Well Boston on Twitter
contributors
Gideon Gil, Health and Science Editor
Elizabeth Comeau, Senior Health Producer
Liz Kowalczyk
Kay Lazar
Gideon Gil, Health and Science Editor
Elizabeth Comeau, Senior Health Producer
Liz Kowalczyk
Kay Lazar







