< Back to front page Text size +

State drops idea of posting hospital-wide death rates

Posted by Gideon Gil  August 20, 2010 04:42 PM
  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Rejecting a request from consumer advocates, a state panel decided this week not to publicly post overall patient death rates for individual Massachusetts hospitals -- at least for now.

Health and Human Services Secretary Dr. JudyAnn Bigby, who heads the group that made the decision, said current methodology for calculating hospital-wide mortality rates is so flawed that officials do not believe it would be useful to hospitals and patients and could harm public trust in government.

"The problem is that there is no gold standard," she said. "If the reports that are generated from these methodologies don't give hospitals useful information they can act on, what is the point?"

Two years ago, Health Care for All, a Boston-based consumer advocacy group, asked the state's Health Care Quality and Cost Council to look at making public hospital-wide mortality rates.

The federal government and the state now publish mortality rates for certain individual procedures and conditions, such as pneumonia and heart attacks, but the hope was one hospital-wide rate for all patients '"would be a proxy for understanding the overall quality of care and safety at a hospital," Bigby said.

The council convened an expert panel, which worked with researchers to evaluate software of four companies for measuring hospital mortality. The problem was that researchers came out with vastly different results when they used the various methodologies to calculate hospital mortality between 2004 and 2007 in Massachusetts, and they could not tell which company's results -- or if any -- were accurate.

"In every year there were at least a couple of hospitals ranked as having low mortality with one vendor, and high mortality with another," said Dr. Kenneth Sands, senior vice president of health care quality at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and a member of the expert panel. "That hospital could either be eviscerated or rewarded depending on which vendor you choose."

Deborah Wachenheim, consumer health quality coordinator for Health Care for All and another member of the expert panel, said despite the group's initial interest, hospital-wide death rates aren't ready for prime time.

"You want information out there, but you want to make sure it's good information," she said.

  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

About white coat notes

White Coat Notes covers the latest from the health care industry, hospitals, doctors offices, labs, insurers, and the corridors of government. Chelsea Conaboy previously covered health care for The Philadelphia Inquirer. Write her at cconaboy@boston.com. Follow her on Twitter: @cconaboy.
health answers

Long-term health consequences to being born prematurely? It's estimated that each year nearly 500,000 babies in the United States are born prematurely, or before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Submit question | More answers

Health&Wellness video

Health search

Find news and information on:
archives