Boston moves toward trans fats ban
Rule to take effect later this year if OK'd
Following the lead of New York City and Brookline, health regulators in Boston last night took the first step toward banning artery-clogging trans fat from French fries, doughnuts, and other food sold in restaurants and corner stores.
The Boston Public Health Commission voted unanimously, after little discussion, to give preliminary approval to a ban that would take effect late this year if it receives another thumbs-up in the spring. Commission members were spurred to action by scientific evidence linking artificial trans fat to heart disease in humans and to diabetes and obesity in animal studies. Brookline approved a similar ban last May.
"There is no need to have artificial trans fat," said Anne McHugh, project director of the Health Department's Boston Steps program, which combats obesity, diabetes, and other chronic diseases. "It's just bad."
In many respects, though, the Boston ban appears to be a regulation in search of a need. New York City prohibited trans fat in the fall of 2006, and in the food business, as goes New York, so goes the rest of the restaurant world.
For large chains such as
In Boston last night, restaurateurs reacted to the health commission's move with a collective shrug. At the Milky Way Lounge & Lanes in Jamaica Plain, the cooks eliminated trans fat oils a year ago.
"It seemed to be what people want," general manager Carol Downs said. "I think it's a good move by the city."
Boyce Slayman Jr. has never used trans fats at his two-year-old Poppa B's soul food restaurant in Dorchester because "the majority of people may not want them in their food."
"A small amount of people think using them adds flavor," he said. "It's a matter of how you're raised and taught."
Even bakers, who long cherished artificial trans fat for its ability to extend shelf life and to give certain pastries their flaky texture, have increasingly abandoned the ingredient.
"To my knowledge, nothing we have here contains trans fats," said Helen Matthews, one of the bakers at Fiore's Bakery in Jamaica Plain. "We do a lot of research to make sure."
Scientists at the Harvard School of Public Health conducted much of the landmark research into trans fat, establishing the link between the substance and cardiovascular disease in people. Primate studies have also shown that consuming trans fat can elevate the risk of a condition that is a precursor to diabetes and also pack fat around the belly, where it is believed to be more dangerous than elsewhere.
Studies estimate that having as few as 40 calories of trans fat a day can boost the risk of a heart attack by 23 percent. A fast-food meal of chicken nuggets and French fries, if prepared with artificial trans fat, can easily contain more than 100 calories of the substance.
The quest to ban trans fat has roots in earlier campaigns to ban smoking from restaurants and taverns, a major public health intervention that faced stiff opposition from business owners. Champions of trans fat bans had anticipated a similar reaction, expecting to be branded as do-gooders who wanted to take the pleasure out of dining.
Instead, the bans faced little opposition, and when Massachusetts lawmakers held a hearing to discuss a statewide prohibition last year, the president of the Massachusetts Restaurant Association said his confederation would not challenge the proposal, which won approval from a key legislative committee and awaits final action.
The Boston prohibition would include all restaurants, including school and hospital cafeterias, as well as food that is prepared in kitchens inside groceries and delis. Consumers would still be able to buy packaged snack foods containing trans fat, although even those products are increasingly going trans fat-free.
City inspectors will visit businesses to make sure they comply with the ban, and scofflaws could face fines of up to $1,000 for each violation. A public hearing on the ban will be held in March, with a final vote anticipated later in the spring, said Fatema Fazendeiro, a lawyer with the city's Health Department.
If the Public Health Commission gives its final blessing, the prohibition would go into effect in two phases. The first, probably starting in November, would ban partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, used for deep frying, as well as margarine. The second phase would start being enforced six months later, banishing lard and other ingredients that bakers use.
Stephen Smith can be reached at stsmith@globe.com.
(Correction: Because of a reporting error, a story in Friday's City & Region section about a proposal to ban trans fat in foods sold in Boston restaurants and corner stores incorrectly said it would prohibit the use of lard. Lard, which does not contain artificial trans fat, would not be affected.)
