Caught by the cameras?
Photos would be allowed to zoom in on traffic violators
The light has been yellow a little too long, but there's no police officer in sight, so you punch it anyway, zipping through even as the opposing traffic gets the green. A few weeks later, a ticket shows up in the mail. With it is a picture of your car in the middle of the intersection, license plate clear as day, with a marker showing the exact time passed since the light turned red.
Busted.
That scene could soon be reality in Massachusetts if a bill working its way through the State House passes this month.
Red-light cameras are used all over the country, and a similar system currently works to catch drivers who pass through Fast Lane toll gates without the appropriate transponder. The idea of automatically issuing tickets for red-light violators has been eagerly anticipated in a number of Massachusetts communities, where officials are hungry for the thousands in extra revenue such a system could generate. Some cities and towns, including Lawrence, didn't even wait for the Legislature - they have already passed local laws approving the technology and the ticketing. Many more are studying it. Until legislation is passed on Beacon Hill, however, no community can install the cameras without running up against state law.
Various bills to legalize red-light cameras have been languishing at the State House for years, but last week, a version that would give all cities and towns the local option to use the systems was reported favorably out of the Legislature's Joint Committee on Transportation. The measure included a $25 fine, reduced from $100, and provides for no insurance surcharge for car owners who are issued tickets.
State Senator Robert Hedlund, a Weymouth Republican and member of the Transportation Committee, said despite continuing opposition, the proposed legislation certainly has more momentum than in years past.
"I think people are becoming less adherent to our traffic laws," Hedlund said. "But the flip side of that is this just strikes me as maybe a little too much '1984'-ish."
Hedlund "reserved his rights" in voting on the decision to move the measure out of committee, meaning he didn't vote either way because he is on the fence. Coincidentally, Hedlund received an automated ticket about a decade ago in Boston, which was running an experimental red-light camera program. He said he got stuck behind a bus at Beacon and Tremont streets as the light turned red. He contested the ticket and won.
The current measure would have to pass the House and Senate by July 31, when the formal legislative session ends, but Hedlund said that is entirely possible. It could move quickly out of the Ways and Means Committee and onto the House floor, where it would likely pass, he predicted.
Just in the last year or two, there has been a noticeable shift in attitude toward red-light cameras. Cities and towns - police chiefs and mayors and town meeting members - are increasingly talking about it, studying it, and winning approval from residents. They are meeting with the companies that provide the technology to see how it works. And they are lobbying Beacon Hill for a change.
The Massachusetts Municipal Association is helping the cause.
"We're very encouraged by the bill coming out of the committee," said Geoffrey Beckwith, executive director of the association, which advocates on behalf of municipalities. "Over the last couple of years, there's been a significant increase in interest."
State Representative Patrick Natale, a Woburn Democrat, was one of only two legislators on the Transportation Committee to vote against the bill. He said he believes the support is about money, and even though cities and towns are struggling, it's wrong to hit taxpayers with these kinds of tickets.
"I really do believe, at the end of the day, a lot of these red-light cameras they want to install have everything to do with generating revenue for cities and towns," he said. "This is not the route we should go."
He said he also doesn't buy the promise that it wouldn't add to a driver's insurance bills. The seatbelt law was originally the same way, but has since been changed, he noted.
Arguments against the cameras include privacy intrusion and a concern, supported by some studies, that rear-end accidents increase because drivers slam on their brakes to avoid tickets. Police unions have opposed the automatic systems, saying traffic enforcement is the job of officers.
Supporters point to studies that indicate such systems can help save lives.
Most police chiefs interviewed were enthusiastic about red-light monitoring. But Frederick Ryan, Arlington's chief, was somewhat more measured in his response.
"We don't see it as being the panacea to solving our traffic enforcement challenges, but it would be another tool in our toolbox," he said. "In my opinion, there's no technology that can replace the value of a police officer interacting with a motorist and having a productive conversation around driver safety."
Still, he said that if the bill passes, he would like to use the technology at several intersections to improve safety. The junction of Massachusetts Avenue and Mystic Street was the first to pop to mind as problematic, he said.
Lowell City Manager Bernard Lynch said city officials are definitely interested in the system, but are in a holding pattern pending state action.
"We use cameras for tolls, so there is use of this type of technology already in existence in the state and outside the state and it's very effective," he said. Although the technology varies somewhat by company, Josh Weiss, a spokesman for Arizona-based supplier American Traffic Solutions, explained how his company's systems work.
In some communities, the company splits the ticket revenue with towns on a negotiated percentage basis. In Massachusetts, the percentage setup would be outlawed, he said, so the company would charge a flat fee per camera to municipalities. He said he could not estimate what that fee would be.
Signs are placed at the intersection warning drivers of the monitoring system, said Weiss. The cameras take two shots, one before the vehicle enters the intersection, showing the light already red, and another when the car is in the intersection, with a zoom in to the license plate on either shot. Videotape is also recorded. The information is sent to the local police department for review; whether or not to send out a ticket is decided locally. A ticket would go to the registered owner and the person can appeal the fine, which under the proposed Massachusetts bill would not affect insurance rates.
Weiss said his company has seen a huge jump in interest from cities and towns across the state, and has talked to about 75 so far, mostly in the last year. The company already has contracts with two municipalities in the state, Salem and Dartmouth, pending legislative approval. Nationally, his company works in 350 towns and cities, including New York, in 27 states.
The bill that made it through the Transportation Committee last week specifically prohibits the system from taking "a frontal view photograph" of the vehicle, which could presumably be used to identify the driver. The photos cannot be used in any other judicial or administrative proceeding other than ones specifically associated with the running of a red light. Also, according to the bill, the violation does not become part of the owner's operating record.
In order to address concerns about the financial incentive for the company that provides the cameras, the bill states that the company cannot be paid based on the number of citations or a percentage of that revenue.
The bill is sponsored by state Representative Kevin Honan, a Brighton Democrat, who did not return several calls for comment last week.
The ACLU of Massachusetts is concerned about several problems with red-light camera systems, according to Sarah Wunsch, staff attorney.
"Once they put these things in place, they never remain confined to that original purpose," she said. "The 'Big Brother is watching you' example is real." She said the ACLU also is concerned about the reports that say rear-end collisions go up as people hit their brakes to avoid a ticket.
"Most people would like to see more police out there," said Wunsch.
Lisa Kocian can be reached at 508-820-4231 or lkocian@globe.com. 