< Back to Front Page Text size +

Dario Fo and the pope in Cambridge

Posted by Michael Paulson September 7, 2008 12:43 PM

DF2.jpg

In 1997, Italian playwright Dario Fo shocked the literary world by winning the Nobel Prize for literature. The Nobel judges praised Fo as a writer/performer "who emulates the jesters of the Middle Ages in scourging authority and upholding the dignity of the downtrodden." But the Catholic Church, often a target of Fo's anti-authoritarian satire, made clear its unhappiness: L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper, called the decision "beyond all imagination,'' while here in the U.S., the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights called the award "a Nobel Prize for anti-Catholicism'' and declared "the deans of literature enjoy celebrating what the common folk regard as trash.''

Fo himself acknowledged the reaction in his Nobel lecture, saying:

"Sundry potentates - great electors of the Pope, bishops, cardinals and prelates of Opus Dei - have all gone through the ceiling, to the point that they've even petitioned for the reinstatement of the law that allowed jesters to be burned at the stake. Over a slow fire."

I'd never seen a work by Fo until last night, when I had the opportunity to go see the Nora Theatre Company's production of "We Won't Pay! We Won't Pay!" which runs through Sept. 28 at the brand new Central Square Theater in Cambridge. The play, written in 1974, is not among his most controversial (that honor may go to a play called "The Pope and the Witch,'' a 1989 work in which a paranoid pope thinks a group of children gathered to pray in St. Peter's Square are rallying for abortion rights).

"We Won't Pay!" is an anti-capitalist comedy about inflation and poverty with a touch of repression and revolution. Its satirical eye is focused on government, police and corporate indifference. But it offers a taste of Fo's willingness to mock Catholic devotional practices, with a fantastical (and funny) scene spinning out a zany story about the blessings and curses offered by one St. Eulalia, and also with an ongoing gag about a character's supposed decision to stop taking the pill because the pope has been appearing in her dreams.

The play (whose title is sometimes translated as "We Can't Pay? We Won't Pay!") is more than a bit unsubtle for my taste (and a bit of a predictable programming choice for Cambridge -- it was previously staged at the ART in 1999); you'll have to wait for the Globe's critic for an assessment of the production and the performances. But it certainly provides an opportunity to get the flavor of Fo's work, and more than a few laughs as well.

(Photo, of Scott Severance as Giovanni and Stephanie Clayman as Antonia, by Kippy Goldfarb/Carol Photography.)

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
3 comments so far...
  1. an easy and often deserving target to be sure...and plays perfectly through the not so veiled anti-catholicsm that has raged here in New England for well over 200 years ( google it!)

    Posted by MCurren September 8, 08 07:07 AM
  1. Do you know the history of the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church?

    Some of the most brutal regimes in history! Churches!

    What about that is defensible?

    Posted by Dave Welch September 8, 08 08:28 AM
  1. I'm not sure what the point of this article is. Surely Fo is on solid comic and dramatic ground in "mocking Catholic devotional practices" - Catholic magic (and I speak as one raised in Catholicism) is just as funny as other superstitions are, and Fo is an accomplished comedian and satirist (indeed, the writer of the post seems to realize this, when he points out that the sequences about "Saint Eulalia" are "fantastical and funny)". I understand, though, why Catholics can sometimes feel persecuted by comedians like Fo, because the new, dominant American religious sects - the market-inspired, pseudo-Protestant evangelicals and their ilk- are so rarely satirized in this country. We just don't have a figure like Fo to target the Southern Baptists, or Joel Osteen. You don't see religious satire on "Saturday Night Live," or ANY sitcom - you occasionally see it, tentatively presented, on "The Daily Show," or elsewhere on cable, but not often. And I can't think of the last religious satire I saw in a movie theatre - indeed, the explicitly anti-religious "Golden Compass" had to be gutted of all its real content before it could be produced as a feature. So I'd say that while I understand the Catholic response to adventurous European comics like Fo, I'd argue that the answer to their troubles is to demand MORE religious satire, not less.

    Posted by Thomas Garvey September 8, 08 12:20 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Blogger

Michael Paulson covers religion for The Boston Globe. He shared in the Pulitzer Prize in 2003, won the Mike Berger, Templeton and Supple awards in 2008, and is a four-time winner of the Wilbur Award.
E-mail mpaulson@globe.com.

views

Harriet_Severino.JPG

Photo, by Yoon S. Byun of the Globe staff, shows Harriet Severino, 45, practicing Zen meditation on May 19, 2009 at a weekly gathering called Ralph Waldo Emerson Zen Sangha at the First Church in Boston (Unitarian Universalist).


archives